Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offense


davos

Recommended Posts

At this point, patience is a virtue everyone...so let's take a look at the offense:

QB: Newton- :jc: -Null

RB: DeAngelo-Stewart-Goodson-Sutton

FB: Fiammetta

WR: Smith-Gettis-LaFell-Pilares-Edwards-Jamorris Warren-Darvin Adams

TE: Shockey-Barnidge-(Rosario?)-Hartsock

T: Gross, Otah, Zeimba, Gary Will

C: Kalil

G: Wharton, Geoff, Bernadeau, Duke

So, really we're looking at getting an RG and maybe a WR.

The thing with WR is tricky because we don't know (1) What Chud thinks of our current guys & (2) the possibility of blocking a potential pro bowler in Gettis by bringing in an Edwards type. It appears that we want a big crop of young WR that can give Newton options with Chud making them studs

So, do you think we're close, far, or are just a few players away from a competitive NFC South squad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. We have the best backfield in football HANDS DOWN! Fiametta needs to step up again this year! Our WR core granted is young (except smitty) but extremely talented with the right coaching the Panthers will have one of the best WR core shortly and for sometime. Plus our O-line not much needs to b said bout them..............they're goooood. Dont sleep on Shockey either the dude is a beast and a good mentor to Barnidge. So its pretty much up to Ham Newton or Jimmy Slaussen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's likely going to tell the story. He'll have two weeks to prepare, so no excuses.
    • You don't rotate offensive linemen dude shown me one time thats happened for us that wasnt because of a player leaving due to injury or a jumbo package ill wait.
    • I didn't say I thought throwing it was a bad decision, I said I thought not running those 3-5 yard routes to pick up the 1st down wasn't a great call.  Yes the play worked out, but I didn't love the play call, it's like when a bad shooter is taking a 3 and you're yelling "no no no" as they're going up and then they make it so it worked out. That's still gambling on them to make the play and I take no issue with that. But I just went and watched the play again, we had T-Mac and XL running downfield crossing routes, Coker went in motion behind the LOS and then moved up a yard or two after the snap but not even past the LOS, Sanders chipped the DE and then ran a drag route right long the LOS. The play worked out, but I don't really like that particular play call and route tree with the game on the line on a 4th and 2.  If you want to send one route downfield as an option that's fine, but there were only 2 realistic target options with that route tree and they were both 15-20 yards downfield. This is just before Bryce is going to throw it.   You have 2 players off screen downfield, one player who ran a route that never had a chance to get open and didn't even get to the 1st down line, another player just at the line to gain but late in the route because of a chip (and the worst pass catcher of the 4). Do you really think that was a "good play call" in that situation? 
×
×
  • Create New...