Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Started my first homebrew yesterday.


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

I know there is a beer thread, but anything that takes that much of my time deserves it's own.

Have to be honest, it does not smell nearly as good as you would hope when you are getting everything to boil. House still smells a bit "off".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what that means.

in a week or so the yeast will settle to the bottom of the bucket/carboy. That's your yeast cake. That yeast continues to work even after the obvious fermentation is done.

Yeast also provides you with carbonation at the bottling stage.

Honestly, I'd say leave it in there this time around and after you're a little more comfortable you can start thinking about filtering or cold-crashing the beer for clarity. The yeast doesn't affect the taste, if you don't like the way it looks pour it into a glass and leave the sediment at the bottom of the bottle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think the yeast enhances the flavor and body, especially over the long term

americans are just sissies that thinks worms are icky and spiders are scary

oh and snakes are slimy too

yea but trappist ales are an entirely different kind of beer, brewed warm with a different kind of yeast. not saying yeast doesn't have an affect on taste, it does but my understanding is that trappists get an inordinate amount of taste from the yeast. much more than most beer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a funnel with a filter disc. I filter the wort and then I siphon through the filter into a second container before bottling.

I have a bottling bucket, with a nozzle. I guess that I could siphon into a strainer and into the other bucket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...