Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talkin Cam on ATH

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

The worst segment ever.

GTFO ATH!!!

Sadly, Jim Rome's segment was better.

yep.. especially since his homo friend said he was disappointed that Cam didn't run at all.. as if they wouldn't be sitting in that chair complaining how he couldn't throw if he did..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

We sure are picky on when we like the national media.

majority, if not all, of ATH's comments were sports writers talking about the storyline and not the reasons why he should or should not start..

everyone said "new team, might as well put him out there, it'll rejuvenate the fanbase and fill seats"..

Rome's buddy criticized Cam for not running like Vick out there, instead of standing in the pocket and trying to throw the ball.. can't remember what all he said, but he wasn't talking football.. he was talking about "Cam ran a lot in college, thats what he does, he should do what he does".. which is wrong on several counts..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

The point is we use them selectively when it supports our opinion then bash them when we don't like it, calling them clowns and ignorant, etc.

Literally every single day there is a new thread about what the national media said about the Panthers and it's usually complaining.

Quite entertaining

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

The point is we use them selectively when it supports our opinion then bash them when we don't like it, calling them clowns and ignorant, etc.

Literally every single day there is a new thread about what the national media said about the Panthers and it's usually complaining.

Quite entertaining

been going on for years.. Cam is that new new. Pat Y has been ostracized on here for years because he "was out to get the Panthers".. and then he posts 1 article not criticizing the Panthers and he's a great writer, people just don't understand him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...