Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giant vs Cowboys


o803oVaDeR

Recommended Posts

Who here is pulling for the Giants to beat the Cowboys this week?

I know it helps us more for the Giants to lose, but I am hoping they beat the Boys and here is a few reasons why.

1. I really hate the Cowboys and would love for them to miss the playoffs this year.

2. I am not sure we could beat the Giants if they were in danger of losing 3 in a row. A team that good does not lose 3 strait.

3. A win for us and for the Giants set the stage for a great game on Sunday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rooting for the Giants. First, I agree, I don't want to face a Giants team in danger of losing 3 in a row. Second, a win next week plus a Dallas loss clinches a playoff spot for the Panthers. And third, I want the best possible game for Sunday night, so we can TAKE #1 in the NFC from the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're rooting against the outcome that would help YOUR team the panthers. Makes no sense. I don't care if it would make the game better and no matter how much I hate the cowgirls I want some homefield advantage for the Panthers.

The Giants dont really care about home field advantage, they play better on the road anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go Giants... f*ck the cowbitches!

The Panthers will have a chance to take out the Giants themself. If they want homefield they'll have to beat the Giants head to head either way. Let the Giants knock out the punk ass Cowboys.

Giants knock out the Cowboys and we lock up at least a WC spot would be nice. We will take care of the G-Men next week in front of a natinal audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...