Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt cassel trade vs peppers trade.


Pantherman

Recommended Posts

We all know by now the current meeting going on panther and pats for the trade for peppers. Let see former Matt cassel played only one good season with a bunch of top WR in the league. But yet NE was able to get 2rd pic out of chiefs. Not note this point that Matt has not prove he can play a whole season with a normal offensive line and a bunch of normal WR's. But yet the pats got a early 2nd rd pic for him. Yet matt is still unproven QB. Yes he had one Good season with NE. But derek anderson of the cleveland browns had one good season 2 years ago. But this year anderson was a disappiont. That might happen to Matt with the cheifs. But yet NE got a early 2nd from the chiefs for a unproven QB. Now to peppers trading dealing going on right now between pats and carolina. Now the pats are trying to hand us 34 pic chiefs gave them. Yet unlike matt peppers had proven to a great player at his spot on the team. Yes he took had a bad year in 2007 where he only got 2 sacks that year. But remember peppers that year became sick during camp and the preseaon and he wasn't feeling right that whole season. But yet peppers came back this year and got like what 14 sacks. A major comeback from 2 years ago. So in all peppers has proven hisself to be a dependable player. That saying NE does not deserve peppers for a crappy 2nd pic. Peppers is still young and fast and is one of the top defense players in the league. Peppers is worth a least 1st round this year and a 1st next year. So :dita: NE and their cheappa$$ 2nd rd pic. Take it and stick it up your A$$:reddevil: I say keep peppers until another team is willing to pay for peppers.:chillpill::ihih:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mostly agree; if all you can get for Peppers is a 2nd rounder. I say keep him and let him play under the one year deal. That should motivate him enough to get pretty good production. Perhaps another team will come along and offer more. I've said in other posts, last year's Allen deal should be Carolina's floor, that was a #1 and two #3's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"the next offer is always the best offer".

I understand, what do you do when the offers quit comming, or Pep is a hold out in TC and we cut him just to get our money back?

When is enough?

There is no EASY solution, no matter what you have to do what is best for the team at that time.

We have no #1 pick and now have a chance to have the next best thing 2 #2's, with one of them being a very LATE #1 pick, which is what we would have had if we won the SUPER BOWL anyways.

With a non-cap year possible in the making, getting the #34 pick is not that bad for a player who thinks soo high of himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...