Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Lowball this week?


X-Clown

Recommended Posts

ahh sorry guys.....My internet went out last Sunday evening, and the great company of verizon decided it takes over a week to come out and fix the connection. I was also on Vacation all last week, so I have had no where to get internet and for some odd reason my Blackberry would allow me to view the Huddle but not post onto it, because I tried to start one wednesday night and Thursday. I was hoping somebody would get the hint by Friday that there was something wrong, since I have posted LowBall every week by Wednesday, and post the LowBall thread. I am sorry again for the mixup.

How do you guys want to do this......either everybody gets a 400 that has posted any score for the year that way we can stay on track with 35 races with 7 high scores dropped, or we just drop the race and still have 7 high scores on 34 races.

It is up to majority rules.

I am back at work, so Lowball will be posted either Wednesday or Thursday this week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have created the thread, but it honestly slipped my mind until I saw the race results on Sunday. Anyway, I'm fine with the first option, but wouldn't object if we went with the second one.
I used to start threads for Carolina Man (what happened to him, anyways? :() but didn't want to step over the commish's shoes.

I was going to skip the plate races anyways so it doesn't matter to me if we simply drop a maximum of six high scores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...