Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I want Antonio Garay's big sweet ass on the defensive line next year


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Shockey, Connor and Hangartner aren't exactly going to command big paychecks...they'll probably all be able to be had for a little over minimum. The good thing about Connor starting this year: he's not going to get much attention next year in FA with the way he's been playing.

Wasn't counting on them being big paychecks. If they are asking for top dollar they are as good as gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay dude. Since I see you in pretty much every free agent/etc thread talking about how we're fuged because of the cap, what would you have done differently this offseason?

About a million things I don't even know where to start lol

I'll pick the obvious DWill signing. I said the prior year we should look to trade him. Send him to Green Bay for a 3rd and 5th. Draft Kendall Hunter and Davon House. And save over $40 million in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a million things I don't even know where to start lol

I'll pick the obvious DWill signing. I said the prior year we should look to trade him. Send him to Green Bay for a 3rd and 5th. Draft Kendall Hunter and Davon House. And save over $40 million in the process.

DWill was injured last year so his value was probably nothing.

The only signings I disagree with were Davis and DWill, and Davis is about to be cut and DWill will probably be cut/restructured before Stewart is a FA.

Every other guy earned their payday and will help our team in the future. The only other real "questionable" signing was Godfrey, but he's not a bad player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I threw out GB because it made sense given their need and situation but really it would make no difference what team it was.

We did have more than one team calling looking to trade for DWill FYI. But Hurney being Hurney refused to even hear out any offers, even though, at that point, he had zero talks with DWill or his agent about a new contract and had no gauge on what it would take to resign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I threw out GB because it made sense given their need and situation but really it would make no difference what team it was.

We did have more than one team calling looking to trade for DWill FYI. But Hurney being Hurney refused to even hear out any offers, even though, at that point, he had zero talks with DWill or his agent about a new contract and had no gauge on what it would take to resign him.

and you know this how?

look, I agree that the DWill signing was fuging stupid, especially given the direction our team has taken in passing so often.. but no one wants old running backs. we wouldn't have been able to trade him for anything valuable. we should have let him walk, as much as I love him as a panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appearing on Sunday NFL Countdown alongside Chris Mortensen, ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that “at least two teams” called the Carolina Panthers last week regarding the availability of running back DeAngelo Williams.

The teams were reportedly informed that Williams is “unavailable.” As is running back Jonathan Stewart.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/10/report-panthers-running-backs-unavailable-for-trade/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That right there says he didn't. He was unavailable period

And they was willing to take on that b.s contract that he gave. A receiver? 2nd rounder? DEFENSIVE guy. I just dont believe GB would offer some b.s for D.Will, its clear they really want him. They've been trying to get him

Far as Hurney go, didn't his contract run out? Was there ever any solid proof he got extended? I remember talking about this like a year go, so would that mean he working for free? Is someone that lazy to not search for a new GM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
    • Just to be clear: I'm not "downplaying" the talent around Bryce... I'm qualifying it. There's a big difference between saying, "we finally have building blocks that we're actually developing" and "we've done enough to say this is a finished product, NO EXCUSES!" It's possible to believe that the 2023 situation was bad and to believe that the current state, while improved, is still incomplete. That's not inconsistency; that's nuance. As for the footwork stuff, again, I've seen the same clips as others. The claim that Bryce is hopping to see over the line just isn't one I've seen corroborated by analysts or tape breakdown. "Both feet off of the ground to throw" happens a ton for QBs (ex: Mahomes, Rodgers, Purdy, etc.), especially when improvising. You're right that there were some encouraging flashes from Bryce last season, and it's nice to finally hear that after so much time was spent pretending otherwise. I'm not arguing that Bryce is elite, I'm just asking that we evaluate him using consistent, measurable criteria to determine his status as a top-10 QB... whether it's via 3rd down %, red zone efficiency, turnover-worthy plays, or yes, big-time throws (which, by the way, has been a valid part of QB evaluation across the league for years even if it wasn't used here during Kyle Allen or Teddy Bridgewater's years. For reference: Allen had 20 BTT at a 3.9% rate. Teddy had 17 BTT at 3.3%). Like you, I'm hoping to see a competent, entertaining offense this season. That's a baseline we can all root for, even if we don't have the same baseline for what makes a QB top-10 (which, to be fair, is what this conversation has been about... though I respect the attempt to reframe it).
    • I am optimistic that we might be on the verge of fielding a sustainable offense finally. The Bryce stats listed above are definitely encouraging. I don’t want to overly inflate this and disregard the previous 1 and a half seasons of production from Bryce and “cherry pick” stats but do hope the benching turns into an inflection point in his trajectory.      Lots of excitement heading into this season. 
×
×
  • Create New...