Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I want Antonio Garay's big sweet ass on the defensive line next year


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Shockey, Connor and Hangartner aren't exactly going to command big paychecks...they'll probably all be able to be had for a little over minimum. The good thing about Connor starting this year: he's not going to get much attention next year in FA with the way he's been playing.

Wasn't counting on them being big paychecks. If they are asking for top dollar they are as good as gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay dude. Since I see you in pretty much every free agent/etc thread talking about how we're fuged because of the cap, what would you have done differently this offseason?

About a million things I don't even know where to start lol

I'll pick the obvious DWill signing. I said the prior year we should look to trade him. Send him to Green Bay for a 3rd and 5th. Draft Kendall Hunter and Davon House. And save over $40 million in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a million things I don't even know where to start lol

I'll pick the obvious DWill signing. I said the prior year we should look to trade him. Send him to Green Bay for a 3rd and 5th. Draft Kendall Hunter and Davon House. And save over $40 million in the process.

DWill was injured last year so his value was probably nothing.

The only signings I disagree with were Davis and DWill, and Davis is about to be cut and DWill will probably be cut/restructured before Stewart is a FA.

Every other guy earned their payday and will help our team in the future. The only other real "questionable" signing was Godfrey, but he's not a bad player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I threw out GB because it made sense given their need and situation but really it would make no difference what team it was.

We did have more than one team calling looking to trade for DWill FYI. But Hurney being Hurney refused to even hear out any offers, even though, at that point, he had zero talks with DWill or his agent about a new contract and had no gauge on what it would take to resign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I threw out GB because it made sense given their need and situation but really it would make no difference what team it was.

We did have more than one team calling looking to trade for DWill FYI. But Hurney being Hurney refused to even hear out any offers, even though, at that point, he had zero talks with DWill or his agent about a new contract and had no gauge on what it would take to resign him.

and you know this how?

look, I agree that the DWill signing was fuging stupid, especially given the direction our team has taken in passing so often.. but no one wants old running backs. we wouldn't have been able to trade him for anything valuable. we should have let him walk, as much as I love him as a panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appearing on Sunday NFL Countdown alongside Chris Mortensen, ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that “at least two teams” called the Carolina Panthers last week regarding the availability of running back DeAngelo Williams.

The teams were reportedly informed that Williams is “unavailable.” As is running back Jonathan Stewart.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/10/report-panthers-running-backs-unavailable-for-trade/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That right there says he didn't. He was unavailable period

And they was willing to take on that b.s contract that he gave. A receiver? 2nd rounder? DEFENSIVE guy. I just dont believe GB would offer some b.s for D.Will, its clear they really want him. They've been trying to get him

Far as Hurney go, didn't his contract run out? Was there ever any solid proof he got extended? I remember talking about this like a year go, so would that mean he working for free? Is someone that lazy to not search for a new GM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
×
×
  • Create New...