Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Skyward Sword


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

also, i'm really not one to bitch about graphics

but skyward sword barely looks better than OOT

Well the Wii is basically a GameCube when it comes to graphics. Hell even the last Zelda game was on both systems. Love the Zelda franchise brings me back to my childhood with a link to the past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OoT was probably one of the best games ever made. I remember when it first came out how absolutely stunning every single aspect of the game was.

That said, it's not a good measuring stick for any game IMO.

I've loved every LoZ game thats come out since. Some offer more than others, but everyone I've enjoyed a great deal.

I've heard that skyward sword is a bit sappy.. without spoiling any of the story or game play, can someone elaborate on these claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I just noticed that I said tLoZ has sucked since OoT. Thats a little overboard, but I do stand by my statement that tLoZ seems to have gone down hill since then, and seems to be geared more torward children since then.

I watched my buddy play skyward sword some last night, and it looked pretty cool i guess.

Someone mentioned that there is a Wii emulator that will play this game. If you have a link, please send me one. (in a private message since emulators are illegal...)

ocarina of time is heralded as the best game of all time (by many, not all) so doesn't it make sense that the series would go down-hill?

i just don't see how you can like OoT and not any of the games that followed (excluding majora's mask because that game was irritating as fug, still enjoyable though). they stick to their roots and bring back the key gameplay components with every release, all while tastefully adding more innovative features

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...