Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Broncos stat that everyone will ignore...


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Fox is a good coach and I wouldn't be surprised to see him in the postseason in the coming years, his time here just had run out. I don't think the Broncos are that team this year but you really never know next year... he's in a weak division that could allow him to get an easy route to the playoffs, and once he's there, you never really know.

He may be playing football from from decades past but he knows how to play it well, and when players buy in and he's got a QB who can make some nice plays late in the game, he can work 'wonders.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone but the casual fan ignores this stat. The defense is doing a great job helping The Golden Calf of Bristol win. They deserve a lot of credit for that team's success.

The fact is, The Golden Calf of Bristol wins gams when he has to. If there are 2 minutes left in a game, there is no difference in a 38-35 game and a 13-10 game. The Golden Calf of Bristol has gotten the win when he needs to.

I'm glad to see that u believe that The Golden Calf of Bristol is a hero because his FG kicker can get the ball between two goal posts and tie up a game. Sorry Panther fans but, see how that works for other team....

Anyway, Can The Golden Calf of Bristol win a game in 2 minutes if the score is a TD or more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it better to have a QB that finds a way to win or a technically sound QB that cannot?

I don't see The Golden Calf of Bristol winning in the long run.

So we'll see.

The fact is, wins are wins.

Does The Golden Calf of Bristol suck?

Absolutely.

But wins are wins.

But I don't see the wins going on for much longer.

And I don't see Denver making the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...