Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bronco fans mad at Smittys comments...


MGH1989

Recommended Posts

We were talking about extrapolating 198 to 450 or so, not 198 to 7,210. We also talked about how much decline there would need to be in Tebows game to be at or below Cam's level. We never talked about The Golden Calf of Bristol's future success, only used it as a reference for how efficient he was playing this season.

198 to 450 is really still hard to guesstimate because if he threw enough to get to 450 in a season ( which he does not ) That's when things happen in games like the arm getting tired , more errant throws , more chances to make a bad decision. We really can't compare if The Golden Calf of Bristol is running a spread option that doesn't call for near enough pass looks for a defense to make a play on the ball , make adjustments etc.

This ought to be a dead discussion by now honestly until Cam and Tim play similar offenses we can never compare them ever and that's all there is to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

198 to 450 is really still hard to guesstimate because if he threw enough to get to 450 in a season ( which he does not ) That's when things happen in games like the arm getting tired , more errant throws , more chances to make a bad decision. We really can't compare if The Golden Calf of Bristol is running a spread option that doesn't call for near enough pass looks for a defense to make a play on the ball , make adjustments etc.

All I know is The Golden Calf of Bristol would have to be worse than Jimmy Clausen bad from his 199th attempt to his 450th attempt to be at or below Cam's level.

4 TDs in 250 attempts? Go from a TD every 18 throws to a TD every 63 throws? Go from an Int every 99 throws to an Int every 18 throws? I just find that hard to believe in such a short time span. It's more likely to happen that his numbers even out from 198 to 7,000 though. Either way, it just shows that he's playing better football than Cam fans give him credit for and he's helping his team more than hurting them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is The Golden Calf of Bristol would have to be worse than Jimmy Clausen bad from his 199th attempt to his 450th attempt to be at or below Cam's level.

4 TDs in 250 attempts? Go from a TD every 18 throws to a TD every 63 throws? Go from an Int every 99 throws to an Int every 18 throws? I just find that hard to believe in such a short time span. It's more likely to happen that his numbers even out from 198 to 7,000 though. Either way, it just shows that he's playing better football than Cam fans give him credit for and he's helping his team more than hurting them.

But again he does not throw enough in that offense for a defense to take advantage because they are looking for the run 75-80 % of the time .. it's just not a fair comparison. So regardless of how it plays out on paper cool im happy he makes a good decision 60 % of 18 attempts .. what if he has to make 30 .. will it still be the same with blitzers coming at him .. disguised coverages that expect a pass? We can't know .. I honestly don't even think we could be close to the correct guess.

Also to note im not a cam hugger and am not trying to shuckle his balls down my throat by any means and I don't deny The Golden Calf of Bristol anything he's done I only state that we shouldn't even discuss .. we'd be better off comparing newton to gabbert or Dalton as usual .. we are wasting our time with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can keep basing your opinions in a hypothetical world, I'm going to base mine in fact.

Based on the facts, do you think he would go from an Int every 99 passes to an Int every 18 in the next 250 attempts? Do you think his TD production will drop off from 1 TD every 18 to 1 TD every 63 attempts in the next 250 passes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can keep basing your opinions in a hypothetical world, I'm going to base mine in fact.

Based on the facts, do you think he would go from an Int every 99 passes to an Int every 18 in the next 250 attempts? Do you think his TD production will drop off from 1 TD every 18 to 1 TD every 63 attempts in the next 250 passes?

No .. However if he started the season chucking the ball like cam and continued to the end like cam it's a toss up which is why I keep telling you .. YOU CANNOT COMPARE THEM .. I really don't understand why this happens everyday. It's so simple .. I'll draw it out one more time .. Put them in the same offense or at least something similar .. if you cant .. then you cant compare end of story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were talking about extrapolating 198 to 450 or so, not 198 to 7,210. We also talked about how much decline there would need to be in Tebows game to be at or below Cam's level. We never talked about The Golden Calf of Bristol's future success, only used it as a reference for how efficient he was playing this season.

So 198 and 452 are a relatively similar sample size.... okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the comparison is very tough because they are asked to do such different things, but you can't knock one guy for what he's asked to do and does it well vs what another guys is asked to do and is doing it okay. The best you can do is try to come up with some ways to compare but even then it's not the best.

I'd prefer if people were just happy about The Golden Calf of Bristol and let him do his thing, but that's not how the Huddle is. A compliment to another young QB is a slap in the face to Cam and it's a shame they feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can keep basing your opinions in a hypothetical world, I'm going to base mine in fact.

Based on the facts, do you think he would go from an Int every 99 passes to an Int every 18 in the next 250 attempts? Do you think his TD production will drop off from 1 TD every 18 to 1 TD every 63 attempts in the next 250 passes?

Based on the way he throws the ball? Yes... I think it's quite possible.

So you're saying that The Golden Calf of Bristol projects to be a better QB then Peyton Manning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the comparison is very tough because they are asked to do such different things, but you can't knock one guy for what he's asked to do and does it well vs what another guys is asked to do and is doing it okay. The best you can do is try to come up with some ways to compare but even then it's not the best.

I'd prefer if people were just happy about The Golden Calf of Bristol and let him do his thing, but that's not how the Huddle is. A compliment to another young QB is a slap in the face to Cam and it's a shame they feel that way.

Which is why you're just happy about Cam and a compliment to Cam is not a slap in the face to The Golden Calf of Bristol, right?

This whole thread was about Smitty complimenting Cam and saying he'd take him over The Golden Calf of Bristol and you jumped right in with your stats trying to suggest The Golden Calf of Bristol is better.... so I find irony in this newly found "live and let live" attitude of yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That can be a chicken or the egg scenario. Canales knows what the QB is good at and is not good at better than we do.  He would have reasons for not calling deep shots, if he is holding back. They could include protection concerns, as well as any Young related motivations.  I think there always the chance Bryce doesn’t see the man open down the field and it is just that simple, more than a confidence issue. Probably a mix of the two.   
    • This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC.  You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract.    But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 
    • No team hits on every pick.  Every coach and GM will eventually get fired.   We are a better team and have greatly increased the talent on the roster. Bad GMs lead to losses.   I love the teams current setup in the front office and the process in how we look at talent and coaching.  Canales has often said we want to have a player developmental philosophy as a core tenant.  I love that combined with cutting edge analytics and good football knowledge and experience.
×
×
  • Create New...