Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Is Armanti Edwards Still Returning Punts?


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

if you want to settle for a guy to just catch a punt and sacrifice any attempt at better field position, then yeah, Armanti is your guy.

I like to hope our coaching staff isn't going to settle for mediocrity and will try to find a player who can play at the NFL level.. Your right, not many can do it. But you're wrong, only those who can get to have a job.

This.

I love the whole, "but he hasn't dropped anything" argument. GOOD, that's his job. The other part of his job is to get yardage every time, even if the blockers aren't helping him. Sure, no returner does that every time, but the better ones do do it in every game. Armanti does not. Remember that old, beat up dude we had back there a couple season's ago? Forget his name, but he may have come from Tampa. We still had shoddy ST back then, and that guy got yards. Face it, Armanti is not as magical as he was in college, is too short to play QB, and has not shown enough to even get a look at WR except for in garbage time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you've got to remember his name is "Keith Moon's Liver" which tells us several things:

1: He's british, so that gives him a bitter inferiority complex to begin with

2: He's not functioning correctly

and 3: He's spent a lot of time inside another man...

Stop talking poo, son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to hope our coaching staff isn't going to settle for mediocrity and will try to find a player who can play at the NFL level.. Your right, not many can do it. But you're wrong, only those who can get to have a job.

So how fast do you expect an undersized college QB to turn into a WR/PR in the NFL? This is year two and Ive seen worse. You know what coaches dont like, turnovers, thats why Goodson has been on the bench. There are Vets who have muffed more punts this year. They could have replaced Edwards at any point this year. They didnt. Seems the actual people that matter dont think he's that mediocre

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

I love the whole, "but he hasn't dropped anything" argument. GOOD, that's his job. The other part of his job is to get yardage every time, even if the blockers aren't helping him. Sure, no returner does that every time, but the better ones do do it in every game. Armanti does not. Remember that old, beat up dude we had back there a couple season's ago? Forget his name, but he may have come from Tampa. We still had shoddy ST back then, and that guy got yards. Face it, Armanti is not as magical as he was in college, is too short to play QB, and has not shown enough to even get a look at WR except for in garbage time.

#1 theres only about 5 punt returners who actually "can make something happen" consistently

#2 the people starting over him have been playing WR there whole football career, He however has not... So with that said why should he not be given time to develop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

I love the whole, "but he hasn't dropped anything" argument. GOOD, that's his job. The other part of his job is to get yardage every time, even if the blockers aren't helping him. Sure, no returner does that every time, but the better ones do do it in every game. Armanti does not. Remember that old, beat up dude we had back there a couple season's ago? Forget his name, but he may have come from Tampa. We still had shoddy ST back then, and that guy got yards. Face it, Armanti is not as magical as he was in college, is too short to play QB, and has not shown enough to even get a look at WR except for in garbage time.

Which one of your WR's would you replace to give Edwards a shot? And special teams blocking this year is way way worse than in past years. Our gunners just run along side people, they don't block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1 theres only about 5 punt returners who actually "can make something happen" consistently

#2 the people starting over him have been playing WR there whole football career, He however has not... So with that said why should he not be given time to develop?

You answered your own question in #2. This is not No Child Left Behind. This is the NFL, and if you don't cut it here, you get cut, plain and simple.

In AE's case, he was already at a disadvantage having to learn a new position and competing for spots against natural WRs. If he gets cut, which is looking very probable at this point, it's an indictment on Hurney for putting AE in that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You answered your own question in #2. This is not No Child Left Behind. This is the NFL, and if you don't cut it here, you get cut, plain and simple.

In AE's case, he was already at a disadvantage having to learn a new position and competing for spots against natural WRs. If he gets cut, which is looking very probable at this point, it's an indictment on Hurney for putting AE in that position.

Thats like saying,

Hey im going to go buy a baby chicken that can lay eggs and a year later saying welp he isn't laying eggs yet so im going to go ahead and get rid of it rather then letting it mature.

ill go a step farther, just because hes not starting doesn't mean hes not worthy of playing as a backup and waiting for his chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats like saying,

Hey im going to go buy a baby chicken that can lay eggs and a year later saying welp he isn't laying eggs yet so im going to go ahead and get rid of it rather then letting it mature.

What if you have plenty of other chickens that are already matured and producing?

Besides, everyone knows the farm has limited space, so instead of concentrating on a chicken that can't cut it in a unit that has showed promise, we could use that freed up space for some other animals that have struggled, mainly secondary and defensive tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...