Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2012 mock offseason & draft: FA Defense


DaCityKats

Recommended Posts

You can't remove an offer to someone if you outbid someone to be top bid. It screws with the others person's money for the fact that that $4 he had bid, may already be spent somewhere else. The only way you can really remove a bid without screwing someone else up is if no one else has previously bid on that player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't remove an offer to someone if you outbid someone to be top bid. It screws with the others person's money for the fact that that $4 he had bid, may already be spent somewhere else. The only way you can really remove a bid without screwing someone else up is if no one else has previously bid on that player.

Why can't you remove a bid? It's your money to do with as you wish.

Only once you've officially signed the player should that be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't you remove a bid? It's your money to do with as you wish.

Only once you've officially signed the player should that be an issue.

So you would like it if you bid on a player, got outbid, then decided to spend the money elsewhere, only to have the player you had planned not to have dropped on you? And even if you still wanted the player at the price you originally bid, that would lead to more recinded bids to make the cap work, thus screwing up more and more people. At an auction, if you are the top bid, you cant be like "My bad, I decided I didn't want to spend money on this."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't remove an offer to someone if you outbid someone to be top bid. It screws with the others person's money for the fact that that $4 he had bid, may already be spent somewhere else. The only way you can really remove a bid without screwing someone else up is if no one else has previously bid on that player.

I saw other doing it, so that's why I did. I asked DaCityKats and he said we could even though it doesn't state anywhere that you can.

I would understand if the person below me spent his money elsewhere and ultimately he should be able to choose whether he wants him or if can't afford him. It's not entirely like an auction because the transaction isn't simultaneous. So that's where it gets tricky, but I understand why people don't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have an issue with removing bids as long as it doesn't affect other teams. By the rules, if you ever bid over your allotted cap amount, then you are penalized $10. Technically since he would now be the top bidder, that would be on his cap, and if he didn't have the room for it he would be over, thus costing him $10. I understand this could be given a free pass by DaCityKats, but where does it end? If everyone is allowed to remove top offers on people, then its just too much trouble and too much to keep track of...not that its not hard enough already. Its a cascading effect, where one person cancels a bid, then the person who had the top bid had to cancel a couple to make up the cap room and it goes on an on. Its also not an auction in a real life scenario.

Edit: I could also understand rescinding the offer a short period of time after the initial bid, but you are removing it 22 hours later. 2 Hours before the signing deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit: I could also understand rescinding the offer a short period of time after the initial bid, but you are removing it 22 hours later. 2 Hours before the signing deadline.

At least I was kind enough to go back and find the next highest bid and the time. I made a trade and now longer have a need for Trufant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least I was kind enough to go back and find the next highest bid and the time. I made a trade and now longer have a need for Trufant.

No offense, but thats like saying after dinner, "I pulled your car around for you, even though I just stuck you with the bill."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense, but thats like saying after dinner, "I pulled your car around for you, even though I just stuck you with the bill."

Not really, because he can retract his offer as well. He doesn't have to sign him. Poor analogy.

I was just saying that some people are rescinding their offers without letting the person next in line know they are leading.

Not going to spam this thread anymore as it should be for offers and signings only. DaCityKats will handle it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just went back through and skimmed, it looks like you are the only one rescinding offers as the top bid and leaving it to someone else. The only other person that might be, is the Chargers, on laurent robinson($2). I didn't see another bid on him, but I could have missed it. The only other rescinded offers were on $1 bids.

Edit: The laurent robinson thing is a moot point anyways, because people have already bid over the amount that he had bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just went back through and skimmed, it looks like you are the only one rescinding offers as the top bid and leaving it to someone else. The only other person that might be, is the Chargers, on laurent robinson($2). I didn't see another bid on him, but I could have missed it. The only other rescinded offers were on $1 bids.

Edit: The laurent robinson thing is a moot point anyways, because people have already bid over the amount that he had bid.

I can guarantee you I haven't been the only one and certainly not the first. I saw someone else do it and that's when I asked DCK. If it makes you feel any better I will sign Trufant. Or should I leave that up to the Raiders Owner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...