Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Playoffs Rd 1: Miami Heat vs. Atlanta Hawks


King Taharqa

Who will win?  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win?

    • Miami Heat
      10
    • Atlanta Hawks
      7


Recommended Posts

257ogsw.png

(5) Miami Heat (42-39)

3419.jpg

PG-#6 Mario Chalmers

6'1 190 lbs

Kansas

10.0 PPG, 4.9 APG, 2.0 SPG

1987.jpg

SG-#3 Dwayne Wade

6'4 212 lbs

Marquette '03

30.2 PPG, 7.5 APG, 5.0 RPG, 31.7 3PT%

3249.jpg

SF-#8 Jamario Moon

6'8 200 lbs

Meridian CC '07 (Meridian, MS)

7.1 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 37.0 3PT%

2184.jpg

PF-#40 Udonis Haslem

6'8 235 lbs

Florida '03

10.6 PPG, 8.2 RPG, 51.8 FG%

615.jpg

C-#7 Jermaine O'Neal

6'11 258 lbs

Eau Claire HS '96 (Columbia, sC)

13.3 PPG, 6.4 RPG, 2.0 BPG

Bench Players

PG-Chris Quinn

SG-Daequan Cook

SF-James Jones

PF-Michael Beasley

C-Jamaal Magloire

Head Coach

Erik Spoelstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6573b4.png

(4) Atlanta Hawks (47-34)

61.jpg

PG-#10 Mike Bibby

6'2 195 lbs

Arizona '98

14.9 PPG, 5.0 APG, 39.0 3PT%

1007.jpg

SG-#2 Joe Johnson

6'7 240 lbs

Arkansas '01

21.4 PPG, 5.8 APG, 4.4 RPG, 36.0 3PT%

2797.jpg

SF-#24 Marvin Williams

6'9 240 lbs

UNC '05

13.9 PPG, 6.3 RPG, 35.5 3PT%

2411.jpg

PF-#5 Josh Smith

6'9 240 lbs

Oak Hill Academy '04 (Mouth Of Wilson, VA)

15.7 PPG 7.3 RPG, 49.1 FG%

3213.jpg

C-#15 Al Horford

6'10 245 lbs

Florida '07

11.5 PPG, 9.3 RPG, 1.4 BPG

Bench Players

PG-Acie Law

SG-Flip Murray

SF-Maurice Evans

PF-Solomon Jones

C-ZaZa Pachulia

Head Coach

Mike Woodson

--------------

I like the Hawks in 7 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...