Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Possible Jake Delhomme Situation This Season...


Lone Buc Fan

Recommended Posts

Yea was a legit question and I forgot it was the divisonal round as the Panthers made it to the NFC Championship minimum in the years they made it, so I just forgot.

You see this type of situation happen time to time and Jon Gruden pulled his pro bowl QB after the first week, when the loss wasen't entirely Jeff's. The way I could see it being a problem for Jake, even if he is turnover free is if he doesn't throw enough tds to be considered starting material any longer. Thats how I can see it playing out if it did happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, which his inconsistent notions partially led to him being fired. What got Gruden fired was how the season finished, mixed with the majority of the players bitching about how he treated people. Gruden more treated his players as a pawn of his game, and mocked people when they'd either miss time from being hurt, or struggle to produce when playing hurt.

So much potential, just utilized the wrong way. Sucks to see a good coach get have to leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, which his inconsistent notions partially led to him being fired. What got Gruden fired was how the season finished, mixed with the majority of the players bitching about how he treated people. Gruden more treated his players as a pawn of his game, and mocked people when they'd either miss time from being hurt, or struggle to produce when playing hurt.

So much potential, just utilized the wrong way. Sucks to see a good coach get have to leave.

Gruden is/was a bad coach. He managed a Super Bowl against a bad team with a Tony Dungy team, tell me I'm wrong. Other than that, he's been superfluous at best. It's a good thing you got rid of him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gruden is impatient. He pulls QBs faster than he pulls hairs out of his nose.

Somewhere in between Gruden's approach and Fox's approach there is a strategy that makes sense. Gruden changes QBs too quickly and Fox keeps starting the same erratic QB year after year and expects different results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gruden is/was a bad coach. He managed a Super Bowl against a bad team with a Tony Dungy team, tell me I'm wrong. Other than that, he's been superfluous at best. It's a good thing you got rid of him...

Gruden is a decent coach, he was more of a offensive guru then a solid coach on both sides of the ball... thats why Kiffin continued to hold such a large role with the defense when Gruden came in. Gruden had a #1 offense when with Oakland and had the tuck rule not came into effect, Gruden would have put the Raiders into the Super Bowl. He comes to a new team that gave up a arm and a leg to get him and he wins them a super bowl for the first time in what 26 seasons?

Discrediting Gruden's efforts to coach a team, just shows your having a biased view on the situation. Gruden did more for the Bucs then John Fox has did for the Panthers and it was in his first year. Don't forget, the Bucs wouldn't of dominated the Raiders in the fashion that had if Gruden wasen't the coach. Dungy acquired most of the talent but was too passive and didn't have the ability to get the same squad over the hump like Gruden did... trying to say the Raiders were a bad team is ludacris aswell... A good enough defense to hold up and a top notch offense is good enough to be a super bowl calibur team and your saying they were but lol.. that just could easily be said of what the Panther's ability as a team was then over the years if thats the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gruden is a decent coach, he was more of a offensive guru then a solid coach on both sides of the ball... thats why Kiffin continued to hold such a large role with the defense when Gruden came in. Gruden had a #1 offense when with Oakland and had the tuck rule not came into effect, Gruden would have put the Raiders into the Super Bowl. He comes to a new team that gave up a arm and a leg to get him and he wins them a super bowl for the first time in what 26 seasons?

Discrediting Gruden's efforts to coach a team, just shows your having a biased view on the situation. Gruden did more for the Bucs then John Fox has did for the Panthers and it was in his first year. Don't forget, the Bucs wouldn't of dominated the Raiders in the fashion that had if Gruden wasen't the coach. Dungy acquired most of the talent but was too passive and didn't have the ability to get the same squad over the hump like Gruden did... trying to say the Raiders were a bad team is ludacris aswell... A good enough defense to hold up and a top notch offense is good enough to be a super bowl calibur team and your saying they were but lol.. that just could easily be said of what the Panther's ability as a team was then over the years if thats the case.

What did Fox do the season after he took over. Think before you speak, please. Think first...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't put his team in position the same Gruden did... don't discredit Gruden and say hes a bad coach like you did then. Gruden wasen't the best, but he did more then John Fox did is all I'm saying. So, if Gruden was a bad coach.. whats that make John Fox for a coach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year 9-3, barring injuries... the Bucs were a contender. Also, even after the Super Bowl... Gruden still put out some playoff teams. Chris Simms leading the Bucs to the playoffs of all QBs.

Throw that in there with Garcia facing the Giants and the Giants having negative yardage after the 1st quarter. Not all things play into your favor when coaching, but Gruden has accomplished more then Fox has since Gruden is being brought into this discussion and you can't say all of Fox's teams are contenders if they've never put winning seasons together.

That compared to Gruden gives Jon a slight edge, even if he was fired. I didn't agree with the firing and seemed like the entire leauge was in shock aswell. I wouldn't say Gruden is better then Fox, but he's definatley no worse. The results speak for themself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year 9-3, barring injuries... the Bucs were a contender. Also, even after the Super Bowl... Gruden still put out some playoff teams. Chris Simms leading the Bucs to the playoffs of all QBs.

Throw that in there with Garcia facing the Giants and the Giants having negative yardage after the 1st quarter. Not all things play into your favor when coaching, but Gruden has accomplished more then Fox has since Gruden is being brought into this discussion and you can't say all of Fox's teams are contenders if they've never put winning seasons together.

That compared to Gruden gives Jon a slight edge, even if he was fired. I didn't agree with the firing and seemed like the entire leauge was in shock aswell. I wouldn't say Gruden is better then Fox, but he's definatley no worse. The results speak for themself.

Yep...9-3 until they came to town and took an ass kicking so bad that they could never recover.

Gruden is no offensive genius. The Bucs have lived on their defense for years. Gruden liked to stockpile QB's so he could bench one for the other when they did not perform.....that way he had a scapegoat for his poor gameplanning and coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is hypothetical of course and just pertains to this scenario, trying to see what kind of opinions there are..

Say, if the Panthers start the season losing 5 of their first 7 games. With all 3 quarterbacks being in their contract year, do the Panters pull the plug on Jake and end his run as the starting Panther QB... in hopes that the younger guys (Matt Moore and Josh McCown) will pan out for the Panthers at a cheaper price.

Should the plug be pulled on Jake in this type of situation, or do you stick with the guy who has put you in multiple playoff spots?

This would never happen. 2-5 is basically impossible so stop trolling up this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...