Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FTP Server


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

All you IT gurus... we're in need of a new FTP server. Had one for about 5 years now... it's on it's last legs me thinks...

Taking suggestions... the purpose of the server is for us to put data up on here at our office for the other offices to pull down, and somewhat for us to deliver data to clients, but that is a much smaller application with the file sizes being typically less than 1GB total. The inter-office stuff can range from small files to 50+GB uploads.

I'm looking at something like this for this purpose...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822165202

Anybody have one of these?

Our current server runs Linux Open SUSE I think... but I'm not super familiar with Linux, I can get around in it, but it's kind of a pain and I didn't set up the current server. Thinking of going to a Windows based server...

Enlighten me please. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know... and I can get around in it... but I'm not the only one here that will have to deal with it.

I ran several SGI Irix systems back in the day... say 1996-2001... but that's a LONG time ago.

I can do some basic stuff, the other day we had an issue with the drives, and I had to get in there and run fsck and fiddle with the fstab to get it to boot correctly again, but it's a pain in the ass...

Windows may not be the way to go... idk, that's why I asked... my main concern at this point is the hardware though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could use an old office PC and it'd work fine. Unless you have hundreds or even thousands of connections your bottleneck is going to be bandwidth, even with a fiber connection. Spending a couple grand on a server for this is like buying an F350 to haul a bag of sand.

I'm a developer not a sys admin so I can't speak with absolute confidence though. fwiw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could use an old office PC and it'd work fine. Unless you have hundreds or even thousands of connections your bottleneck is going to be bandwidth, even with a fiber connection. Spending a couple grand on a server for this is like buying an F350 to haul a bag of sand.

I'm a developer not a sys admin so I can't speak with absolute confidence though. fwiw

Well that's basically what we have now... an old PC that was serviced into a server by adding some drives and making it into an ftp server...

I have a rack in the back room with the router, switch, fiber box and network cables, and I'd like to get rid of the clutter by adding a rack mount server. That's what I was shooting for anyway...

jbeason up there being a smart ass... I'll make him sit in that room back there and work, how you like that Mr. Burns? MOOOOVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEE!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's basically what we have now... an old PC that was serviced into a server by adding some drives and making it into an ftp server...

I have a rack in the back room with the router, switch, fiber box and network cables, and I'd like to get rid of the clutter by adding a rack mount server. That's what I was shooting for anyway...

jbeason up there being a smart ass... I'll make him sit in that room back there and work, how you like that Mr. Burns? MOOOOVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEE!!!

Then you're fine getting the one you selected. If reliability is an issue you'll want to set up RAID mirroring. It'll cut the storage space in 1/2 but you'll have a duplicate disk if one fails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, bandwidth isn't an issue. We've got a fiber connection here, so that's not a problem. There's only 3 other offices so usually only one is connected at once... most of the bigger stuff is transferred over night.

I just want something reliable and pretty much invisible.

Is that when MCP is streaming pr0n?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...