Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jon Beason Says Poe Would "shore Up Position"


CollegePanther

Recommended Posts

The Panthers do not have a poe like dt. They have a bunch of smaller tackles.

Of course beason wants poe. Beason knows what kind impact poe wil have on the rest of the defense.

Edwards is a big body, space eating, run stuffing NT. please do just a little research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the Giants lost all their CB at times in the season and still was missing a lot of them in the playoffs but as soon as that Dline got healthy they became a force and won the superbowl. Kind of goes against your post.

But the strength of the Giants DL is their DE's, not their DT's. If you want to use the Giants as the example, we should take DE in the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing one's way off a team can be due to a whole range of factors. Ability or effort doesn't necessarily have to be included.

Point is it happen and I'm not ready to sit here and act like Shirley is a sure fire player we can depend on. I don't see how anybody else can as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the strength of the Giants DL is their DE's, not their DT's. If you want to use the Giants as the example, we should take DE in the first.

Their DT's don't get the credit they deserve. Chris Canty and Linvall Joseph are very good players. Not to mention Tuck can be a 3 tech on passing downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As is anybody in this draft NFL production so what's your point?

The diiference is Shirley played his way off a team Cox hasn't yet.

Shirley didn't play his way off a team. He was a guard during his tenure with the Bengals, they already had depth at DT at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point is it happen and I'm not ready to sit here and act like Shirley is a sure fire player we can depend on. I don't see how anybody else can as well.

The point was that we have a pretty decent idea of what we have with Shirley and I don't think Rivera and co. would keep him around had he not shown considerable promise. There were some FA's we could have gone after, but we didn't. We don't have that same level of comfort or confidence in any potential draft picks, nor should we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Poe could eventually become a really good NT in the league. I just think it's going to take time. The eye in the sky don't lie and the eye in the sky says Poe didn't do squat in college playing against weak competition. I think we pass on him and either go with Cox or Kuechly at 9 or trade back and take a guy like Nick Perry from USC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shirley didn't play his way off a team. He was a guard during his tenure with the Bengals, they already had depth at DT at that time.

Which makes my point even more. If you can play DT at a high Level you beat out sombody. You don't just let talent go. Plus we needed a DT help after the 1st day of TC. Why wasn't he brought in sooner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which makes my point even more. If you can play DT at a high Level you beat out sombody. You don't just let talent go. Plus we needed a DT help after the 1st day of TC. Why wasn't he brought in sooner?

He was with the Seahawks then waived, you do know many players have been cut numerous times(Jason Babin) and just need a system they fit in to succeed? Who cares about his stunts with other team, he produced in 4 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point was that we have a pretty decent idea of what we have with Shirley and I don't think Rivera and co. would keep him around had he not shown considerable promise. There were some FA's we could have gone after, but we didn't. We don't have that same level of comfort or confidence in any potential draft picks, nor should we.

I don't see how they know after 4 games what this guy can or can't be. I think he earned a Chance to compete for a roster spot that is all. But they would be fools to just depend on him or any other DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how they know after 4 games what this guy can or can't be. I think he earned a Chance to compete for a roster spot that is all. But they would be fools to just depend on him or any other DT.

Dude, you're arguing against a point no one has made. Go back and re-read all the posts. On second thought, maybe go have a beer or four and then come back and re-read the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't want to depend on Shirley or Kearse.

I would. He produced in a very shaky line. All you need in one more guy in the interior. Cox would be that guy. Poe, to me is a bigger question mark than Cox. Cox has produced in a very good conference, he's one of the most versatile DT's in the draft. Brockers and Poe you're looking at upside. Cox it's upside and production. I will admit, Cox's ceiling is much lower than Brocker and Poe. That's the only snag that doesn't settle with me.

I also know I'm speculating, since he's not played, actually of them haven't, a down in the NFL. Still out of those three guys, I'd go with Cox, then Brockers, finally Poe. Poe is just too over hyped. You would think that in his conference he would be dominant. But he wasn't. He was a presence I won't deny him that. But he wasn't Dominant. Brockers was productive as well, but only one year. Cox is the only consistent one. Just going by logic here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...