Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke Kuechly Acc Network Feature


heyyall

Recommended Posts

I sure wish he was bigger and faster.

When taking a LB top 10 I imagine a freak athlete.

Many consider Patrick Willis to be a "freak athlete" and he was also picked in the top-10. Luke posted a 4.58 40-time, had 27 reps of 225 lbs, a 38 inch standing vertical, and a 123 inch broad jump.

Willis on the other hand, ran a 4.51, did 22 reps, had a 39 inch vertical and had a broad jump of 119 inches...

Kuechly's combination of great instincts and athleticism is going to be huge for our defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many consider Patrick Willis to be a "freak athlete" and he was also picked in the top-10. Luke posted a 4.58 40-time, had 27 reps of 225 lbs, a 38 inch standing vertical, and a 123 inch broad jump.

Willis on the other hand, ran a 4.51, did 22 reps, had a 39 inch vertical and had a broad jump of 119 inches...

Kuechly's combination of great instincts and athleticism is going to be huge for our defense.

Willis was picked just outside the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IDK what you are talking about, He is very fast. He is a very good tackler too.

umm when did 4.58 become VERY fast?!?!

it isnt bad but it certainly isnt elite or very fast.

4.4 - is elite speed

4.50 - is nice / very fast

4.6 - is ok speed in a LB (4.58 is almost 4.6...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

Kuechly has beefed up a lot since this video, just watch the tape.

This is a fugin mans man. He's going to be the crazy white redneck of our defense for the next ten years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...