Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dual-core Samsung Galaxy S III landing on 5 U.S. carriers in June

Darth Biscuit

By Darth Biscuit,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Darth Biscuit Proficient

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

Not too many phones worth a new thread lately... this one should be...

_MG_3747_610x407.JPG

Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and U.S. Cellular will all receive variations of the Galaxy S III this month, but Samsung isn't sharing the exact pricing and release date for each carrier just yet. What we do know is that $200 is the lowest price of the bunch.

What's incredibly interesting (and what CNET had predicted) is that the U.S.-based version, like its

HTC One X rival, will carry a 1.5 GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor as opposed to the 1.4GHz quad-core Samsung Exynos processor that's used in the global release.

The "downgrade" is likely due to a current incompatibility between the

quad-core chip and LTE data networks

, just as with the HTC One X, which forewent the Nvidia Tegra 3 processor that was used in the global version of its hero device.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57446342-94/dual-core-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-landing-on-5-u.s-carriers-in-june/

Looks to be a hot phone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Proficient

Darth Biscuit

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yep. Mine has a dual core at the same speed. I read it might only have 1GB of RAM still. Although Japan has a model with 2. I MIGHT get it if ATT gets the 2 gig model. Phone still runs out of memory on ICS pretty quick when browsing flash-based websites.

That sucks... I don't have ICS on my Rezound yet... not sure if the update is available or not, haven't looked. I'm happy with Gingerbread for now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Another, Another Bryce Breakdown

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean the interception injury he ran down that KB gave up on and the TJ Watt shoulder hit basically did Cam in. He could probably still launch a better 30 yarder off platform than BY
    • loriaolel
      ™https://www.facebook.com/NaturesLeafCBDGummiesUS/

      By loriaolel · Posted

      https://www.facebook.com/NaturesLeafCBDGummiesUS/ https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/1451e196-1526-ef11-a81c-000d3a21aae6 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/526d8672-1226-ef11-a81c-000d3ade4d01 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/6ae1ace0-1226-ef11-a81c-000d3ade4d01 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/915da3ce-fd24-ef11-a81c-000d3aadac6f https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/5a560ed7-1b26-ef11-a81c-000d3a21aae6 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/08a2e68f-1c26-ef11-a81c-000d3a21aae6 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/6e1993c2-1d26-ef11-a81c-7c1e5226d343 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/af198fe8-1d26-ef11-a81c-7c1e5226d343 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/5c349e6c-1e26-ef11-a81c-7c1e5226d343 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/2ed9b5f7-1e26-ef11-a81c-7c1e5226d343 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/cf80e082-4e25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/94a0ddaf-4a25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/9f093178-4c25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/836e30e2-5125-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/294c66ad-5225-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/bb496496-5325-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/b6d687a5-5125-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/dbe6c938-5825-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/4d8213d8-5b25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/006dea4b-5c25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/17a9f4cb-5c25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/e8e67592-5d25-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/dd89ccb7-e023-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/9bfbb515-e223-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/forums/general-discussion/19522606-de23-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/13f0c02d-8024-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/b6e893b5-8024-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/bb23893d-8124-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/f90b6aaf-8124-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/ce097323-8224-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/ab104f46-8224-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/011c6e79-3924-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/8e3b228a-3724-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/09f6d730-3624-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/de9d7f14-3524-ef11-a81c-000d3a21be93 https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/1b99c042-3224-ef11-a81c-000d3aadfbeb https://ergologic.microsoftcrmportals.com/el-GR/forums/general-discussion/f6e7569a-fb24-ef11-a81c-000d3aadac6f
    • kungfoodude
      Another, Another Bryce Breakdown

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I mean, Cam had the arm strength to make those throws without his feet set but it also was one of the factors that led to his arm getting destroyed over time. No QB needs to be making those off platform throws or without their feet being set often, because they are lower percentage throws(usually) and they are more difficult on your body overall. Bryce's physical limitations weren't a complete unknown. He is a moderately below average NFL arm even if his feet are set and he has time. That's not what will solely keep him from being successful. It definitely is a career limiting factor, however.
×
×
  • Create New...