Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Political Conspiracy


Gallagher

Recommended Posts

Never thought I would want Carolina to lose.....

If that were true, I'd be rooting for the Bucs in that game.

hey guys, did you know that if that were true, i'd be pulling for the bucs

it's true, i would. not the panthers. the bucs. you get it

I don't care who y'all are going to vote for. As long as you're Panther fans, you're all right by me.

Mixing football with politics? fug you

I know. I'm sorry. This was all a terrible idea. It's just the last week of what has been a long, long offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you read the title of the main op yet ?

While I can't speak for others, I most certainly do not. I let their own intelligent or .....otherwise, arguments mold my perceptions. Now as to my previous statement - political argument belongs in the Tinderbox, hence my comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, there is nothing wrong with you original post. This is after all a freaking football forum. Everything football and especially Carolina Panthers football goes would be my assumption.

I don't care who y'all are going to vote for. As long as you're Panther fans, you're all right by me.

I know. I'm sorry. This was all a terrible idea. It's just the last week of what has been a long, long offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are that guy.

I'm probably one of the most active politically motivated posters on this board, and no I'm not a follower of either one of the false-partisan assbageries. I just do so in it's proper place.

In an effort not to extend this pissing match any farther, consider this my last reply to this slap fest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must be confused since I do not have a high post count, but I have been reading this forum since the conception years ago. I had to change monikers since I lost my email and password but nevertheless read SOME of you guys' pooty crap you post. I guess since reading the garbage some of you spit out, I felt the need to install some dialogue which consists of intelliegence versus idiocracy.

"I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don't have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills; skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you leave now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will kill you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don't have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills; skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you leave now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will kill you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...