Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Projected WR and RB Corps


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Seems to be heavy contention at WR after #3 (Murphy/Gettis) and the last RB spot. Who do you think makes it?

Would you be in favor of keeping both Smith and Poole at RB? Because otherwise, I don't see either of them sticking on the PS without another team scooping them up.

EDIT: No need to list DWill, JStew, or Tolbert...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonight's performances definitely gave Hurney and RR a lot to think about...

Bryant's huge play, Armanti flashed here and there and Hurney spoke highly of him, Jared Green looked really good, Tutu continued to look horrible, Pilares shows potential as a receiver along with his already established ST abilities, and Smith and Poole both looked awesome.

Just a lot of talent to choose from and a lot of young guys I'm excited about. That being said, what I do know is, if we keep Tutu, I'm gonna be pissed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something for people to keep in mind is that Armond Smith is 26 years old. Tauren Poole is 22. Poole will make it over Smith based on the age factor. Armond Smith has PS eligibility still (I believe). They'll roll the dice on losing him over the younger back I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...