Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roll Call - Seaguls at Panthers - Who is going?


Zod

Recommended Posts

you shouldn't take a child to a football game under 6 or 7.........

3 is way too young but, good luck............with the kids of course. Fu*k the Seahags.

I took them to Cleveland last year and didn't have any issues. They said it supposed to be family friendly. Of course if things start getting out of hand I have no issue with leaving the game or calling security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as we're not getting things thrown our way and the swearing isn't over the top obnoxious, some heckling is all in good fun to me and should be expected. I just don't want my kids or parents to have to worry about fights or beer "spilled" on them.

There might be a heckler or two, but if you have children and elderly parents, anyone who can handle their alcohol will leave you alone. That being said - like others have mentioned, a later game means more intoxicated people. You should be ok, though. Fans may get a little more rowdy in the 500s, but most likely won't be asshats..... unless, of course, you deserve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There might be a heckler or two, but if you have children and elderly parents, anyone who can handle their alcohol will leave you alone. That being said - like others have mentioned, a later game means more intoxicated people. You should be ok, though. Fans may get a little more rowdy in the 500s, but most likely won't be asshats..... unless, of course, you deserve it.

I reserve the right to be an asshat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...