Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Demarcus Cousins to Charlotte?


Panthers Nation

Recommended Posts

According to kentucky sports radio Cousins was told he would land on either of these 4 teams Charlotte,Orlando,Boston,Dallas.The source said the talks where ongoing but Cousins expects to have a deal done soon.

You guys easily can make the best offer especially if you were willing to give up your lottery pick.

*Im trying to find the link but I got it from RealGM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cousins to Charlotte doesnt make sense. Bobcats cant trade their 1st this year (technically owed to the bulls), best offer they could give is Detroit's pick plus maybe Henderson? They arent giving up MKG, and I doubt they trade Kemba with the way he has been playing.

If thats the best offer Sac can get then I'm not sure why they would trade him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked out the NBA Trade Machine and this is really all we could offer

Byron Mullens, Gerald Henderson, 1st Round Pick (from Detroit)

Byron Mullens, Bismack Biyombo, 1st Round Pick (From Detroit)

At 22 years old, the acquisition of Cousins is almost like spending a draft pick anyway.

Kemba-Henderson-MKG-2013 pick-Cousins.

That's a heckuva young core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I saw that you said trade the 2013 pick, I'd leave that out of there because Cousins is not worth possibly the number one overall pick in the draft. I say give them Detroits which will probably find it's way to them in 2015.

we can't trade our 2013 pick. Technically it belongs to Chicago
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm talking about the pick we got from Detroit in the BG8 trade.

Here are our outstanding trades...

Outgoing:

Bulls receive the Bobcats' 2012 first-round pick (top 14 protected in 2012, top 12 protected in 2013, top 10 protected in 2014, top 8 protected in 2015, unprotected in 2016) (Tyrus Thomas Trade)

Rockets receive the Bobcats' 2013 second round pick. (via OKC and Boston) (Byron Mullens Trade)

Spurs receive the Bobcats' 2016 second-round pick (top 55 protected, or extinguished) (Theo Ratliff Trade)

Incoming

Bobcats receive the Blazers' 2013 first-round pick (top 12 protected in the 2013, 2014, and 2015, and unprotected in 2016) (Gerald Wallace Trade)

Bobcats receive the Pistons 2013 first-round pick (lottery protected in 2013, top 8 protected in 2014, top 1 protected in 2015, and unprotected in 2016) (Corey Maggette Trade)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can trade away incoming picks so I say give them Detroit's because that one won't be seen until 2015 as where the Bobcats might have an opportunity for two picks in the lottery with Charlotte slotted at four and Portland slotted at 15.

Right now, the Bobcats would currently hold the fourth pick (unless the balls bounced are way) and the 15th pick.

Trade away Mullens, Hendo, and the Detroit pick for Cousins then draft a stud shooting guard with the fourth pick and power forward depth with the 15th pick and we're playoff bound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...