Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

e3!


C47

Recommended Posts

It's the time every nerd loves.  e3 is here, and it's even better because we get new consoles as well!  Here's the thread to talk about the biggest video game convention of the year.  While it may not be as big as it once was, there's still a lot to look forward to.  Sony and Microsoft conferences are today MS @ 12:30 on Spike, and Sony at 8:30 on G4 unless you have Directv in which case you will have to stream.  EA and Ubisoft are splashed in between, with promises of next gen EA sports games, Battlefield 4 multiplayer and more Watchdogs.  Nintendo opted not to hold a big press conference, and will instead show games to media members at small exclusive events throughout the week.  

 

What are you guys looking forward to??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why Microsoft has taken this timeslot the last few years.  It's worked out because they're conferences have been bad at best the last three years but this year in particular they should have a lot of stuff to show that would get people excited.  Oh well....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Killer Instinct is alright, but Banjo Kazooie would have been SOOOOOOO much better......

 

Was really hoping for Banjo, disappointed for sure about that. 

 

Also Ryse looked stupid with all the contextual button prompts. 

 

 

Also why give stage time for Minecraft. lmao

 

Forza looked amazing which was expected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...