Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFT: Panthers 25th in Pre-Season Rankings


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

While some of it is restating the obvious, this is not bad analysis by SI.com about the Panthers, if anything it is much more optimistic of our outlook than DG...

 

http://catcrave.com/2013/07/11/carolina-panthersbetter-than-advertised/

What's with this guy adding 55 lbs. to Tolbert's weight? Hard to put much stock in his opinion if he can't get his facts straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's with this guy adding 55 lbs. to Tolbert's weight? Hard to put much stock in his opinion if he can't get his facts straight.

Yea ur right. I didn't catch that. I think this guy (the writer ) writes on both the Panthers and Ravens regularly. Kind of strange. I'm on my phone so can't verify right now but I think that is him. College student writes on Yahoo a lot also. Good catch on the weight error regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually enjoy reading PFT sometimes, but in terms of their rankings having any predictive value for the upcoming season...its almost comical.

 

On a bright note as far as NFL predictions for 2013, FootballOutsiders released their almanac for the 2013 season last night.  They have the Panthers winning 9.5 games on average, hands down the class of the NFC south, and a top 3 team in the NFC. 

 

Points out our one glaring weakness is horrible coaching, shows how poor coaching decisions cost us many games last season, and how we should have been a playoff team.  Talks a little about Cam in pressure situations (2nd half, in one score games) and how his performance increases greatly in those spots. 

 

New Orleans ranked second in the division, projected to win 8.5 games, Tampa at 8.3.

 

Atlanta regresses heavily, with a projection of 7.8 wins, based on an aging team, who barely beat a lot of bad teams in 2012.

 

Don't wanna post too much of what they wrote since it's actually a book their selling.  If you're a math guy you'll really love it.  Even if you're not its a 600 page PDF of very in depth football analysis.  I think its $12, well worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...