Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets concept thread


chubs2496

Recommended Posts

I expect to see them keep the original logo, maybe with a few minor tweaks and color changes.

 

 

If they were actually going to change things up, I thought this design was pretty sweet and unique

9017239875_f86c910d9a_z.jpg

I haven't liked any of the new ones, but this one is pretty cool and should be considered as an alternate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone remake the old Hornets logo, only make it predominantly purple with light blue in it? I think that's a reasonable possibility for what it could end up being. 

 

Hey Third, I made this yesterday and posted it on the We Beelieve page.  It's weird how the more 'washed out' purple they're using (and yeah, I took the color samples right off of a 'Buzz City' image) being around the light blue and orange of the basketball almost turns it into a navy-ish color.  

post-12247-0-60474000-1374790444_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Third, I made this yesterday and posted it on the We Beelieve page. It's weird how the more 'washed out' purple they're using (and yeah, I took the color samples right off of a 'Buzz City' image) being around the light blue and orange of the basketball almost turns it into a navy-ish color.

I can't help but dislike those colors. I hope they don't do that. It just looks like light blue and dark blue. And honestly it looks as of the logo is washed up and faded compared to the teal and purple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Third, I made this yesterday and posted it on the We Beelieve page.  It's weird how the more 'washed out' purple they're using (and yeah, I took the color samples right off of a 'Buzz City' image) being around the light blue and orange of the basketball almost turns it into a navy-ish color.  

 

Yeah, if they're going to make the logo a different color I'm still thinking it's gonna be more purple than light blue for some reason. Maybe wishful thinking. 

 

Also, good seeing you (for a minute) at the Hornets announcement last week haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2d6pphu.jpg

 

 

 

Does anybody else look at that and think, "aaahhh, that's better."?  It's like putting on your favorite shirt, or sitting in your old recliner.  It fits, it feels good and you just know your old friend has come home for good.  I could almost cry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if they're going to make the logo a different color I'm still thinking it's gonna be more purple than light blue for some reason. Maybe wishful thinking. 

 

Also, good seeing you (for a minute) at the Hornets announcement last week haha

 

Dear Lord...let me apologize for whatever sloppy inanity I was responsible for.  I'm bad at keeping my thoughts organized in the best of conditions; add free booze and the return of the Hornets, and I'm a goner ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Lord...let me apologize for whatever sloppy inanity I was responsible for.  I'm bad at keeping my thoughts organized in the best of conditions; add free booze and the return of the Hornets, and I'm a goner ;)

 

Haha it wasn't too bad, you were able to get up and down the stairs, but uttering fully coherent sentences was a bit of a challenge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i like B for the classic logo but don't put that on the uni's. E looks like a cool secondary logo or if they made fake "retro" jersey's use it somewhere.

 

i still like the VERY first logo before the one that is B on that website. its similar to E and it may have lasted 2 years at the most. wish i had it but it was cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it shocking, that people can't believe the organization would spruce up the Hornets brand for the relaunch? I mean, had the Hornets stayed in Charlotte originally... you think the team brand would have never changed in 10+ years? Come on! The NBA teams are going for more aggressive, bolder and sharper looks.

 

Just look around the league... 

 

7gltdy9cggrpyehee13xzthez.gif

Very aggressive. Powerful. Compare that to their 80's logo which was the simple outline of the bird's face. The talons here are razor sharp and the logo is trying to derive fear.  This is a major change from the image the team wanted prior. 

 

Even in the point of a team name that doesn't call any sense of aggression: 

 

m2leygieeoy40t46n1qqv0550.gif

 

The Jazz just changed their logo to something more bolder and shaper. Again, the 80's was very simple... the logo now is simple too but just more sharp and bold.

 

I feel like in the 80's when the Hornets logo came around, logos were more fun and cool and simple. Some did have a "tougher" look, like the Minnesota Timberwolves but the Hornets wanted to be "cool" and "fun". I'm just seeing a huge shift from that nowadays.

 

I think we will keep close to the same color scheme or something similar (maybe just darken it a bit). I think in the end, what we will get is something a little more IN YOUR FACE like... 

 

http://hbcuclassics.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/dsuhornets_logo.297193450_std.gif

 

I personally hope that I'm wrong and we keep the classic look, just don't see that being the trend. I do think that MJ will try and find some sort of balance

 

At the very least, we might have a throwback night or two. :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...