Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So....


TerriblePizza

Recommended Posts

I have no problem with him not signing a deal. After all, in his contract year of 2008 he has a career high number of sacks. If he wants to keep playing year to year having to prove himself again and again, it isn't a bad thing. And if he has a bad year or gets injured then he is the one risking losing value. I remember that Sims did that a few years ago for Tampa,IIRC. He turned down a deal feeling he could play out his contract and get more money. He got hurt, never recovered his form and is now a backup in Kansas playing for peanuts.

Frankly if we were going to pay him 100 million for 5 years that is 20 million a year anyway. Seems we can just dole it out year by year, evaluate the results and let him go when he doesn't perform. Meanwhile we have Brown grooming to take his place. By 2011 no one is going to pay him 24 million, he will be 33 and on the downside. He can play anywhere he wants and we got all his best years. Meanwhile Brown comes in, takes his place and we spent 37 million on Peppers instead of the reported 100 million he wants.

Interesting point.. Although he'll be extremely expensive after this year. But we would have gotten 2 "contract years" out of him rather than 1..

Although, I will bet he'll have a 10+ sack season regardless this year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that the Panthers offered him a $100 million plus contract prior to the end of last season that he turned down did they not?

Also, the money is not the only issue, at least it wouldn't be for me... so Pep gets $17 million this year, which by all accounts is a large amount, BUT let's say he played and something happened, has a bad year, gets hurt, etc. and it drastically reduces his value for the upcoming seasons... looking long term financially wouldn't it be smarter for him to sign a longer term contract rather than the one-year tender for $17? Sure he can make $17 mil this year, but he could make $12-$14 mil per year for the next 5 or 6...

Is this not the very reason the players hate the franchise designation?

But that implies that Peppers and/or his agent are smart enough to realize that. I'm not counting on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that implies that Peppers and/or his agent are smart enough to realize that. I'm not counting on it.

that is not entirely accurate, what it implies is that Peppers wants to play ball in Charlotte for the next 5-6 years.

for as much as everyone bashes these two they sure seem to be smelling like roses about now to me. Let's review:

Peppers took the least risk, got seriously paid, and arguably strong-armed some serious changes amongst the key staff and their mentality when it comes to utilizing him on Sundays. He worked out to his liking and personal schedule, forced the front office to make a huge move and get him some help, and only tarnished his name amongst a very small and very wacko contingent of pseudo-fanz on the Carolina Huddle.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...