Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

North Carolina home owners... Prepare thy Anus.


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

 

 

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — 

Every single homeowner in North Carolina could soon have to pay more for insurance, and it's not just a little jump. Eyewitness News uncovered documents that show insurance companies are pushing for a hike on average of 25 percent.

Documents were just filed today by the N.C. Rate Bureau, which represents every company that writes homeowners insurance policies in the state. It's asking for an average increase of 25 percent.

The actual dollar amount will vary by what part of the state you live in, but if approved, it would go into effect on August 1. 

"They just put in an increase last year," Adam Burg said. "They put in an increase this year -- what's it going to be next year?"

According to the North Carolina Department of Insurance, new homeowners insurance rates went into effect in July.

The insurance commissioner already spoke out against the hike: "I am appalled that the insurance companies would request another increase just six months later," Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin said in a statement. "I believe the insurance companies should withdraw this rate filing immediately. If they do not, the insurance companies should expect a full hearing on this matter; I will not entertain any settlement negotiations."

This isn't a done deal by any means. There will be an opportunity for people to speak up about this during a public session in Raleigh on Jan. 24. The Department of Insurance said they will determine if any rate adjustments are warranted. Eyewitness News reached out to the group representing the insurers, but we did not immediately hear back.

 

 

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/homeowners-could-face-insurance-rate-increase/nccF7/#cmComments

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I used to do for a living (set rates) and I can tell you it is all usually BS (from both sides but more often from the DOI). While I never set NC rates here is how it often works.

 

Company uses a bunch of math to show that it needs a 10% rate increase on say single family homes in Lincoln County because they are losing money. DOI says no rate increases over 5% that is our rule. Company can raise rates on other areas (people in other counties) or in other lines (auto) to make up for the downfall or start cancelling policies in Lincoln county except...the DOI also has rules against cancellation so the company is stuck with unprofitable business.

 

Next year comes and the company now says we need a 15% increase. Repeat and eventually the needed rate increase becomes huge.

 

The insurance commissioner is an elected official and approving a 25% rate increase would be political suicide so he says he is "appalled." He mentions six months but that is usually how often rates are reviewed, nothing new in that. The DOI will determine if rate increases are needed basically means they will say no.

 

The end result of this can be that eventually companies just decide to stop writing business in the state or when a really bad year hits they go insolvent. Usually the commissioner gets replaced and things work out but sometimes they don't

 

You can look at this report and see that companies generally lose money on the actual business they write but make up for it on investments and tax losses. While 2013 looks like a pretty good year you can see that for 2011 companies paid out $1.10 for every $1.00 they took in. You can also see some ROI numbers below 5% which is terrible for any industry. The companies have been lucky to see increased capital.

 

http://www.naic.org/documents/topic_insurance_industry_snapshots_2013_pc.pdf

 

These numbers are usually realistic as far as what increase is needed although the insurance companies will do some funny things too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...