Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wild graph showing all 32 offensive ranks by yards and points per game.


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

That is one interpretation.  Another one is that the defense went from top 15 last year to top 5 in part because of the offense we ran.  He ran what the team and Rivera wanted to run.  You like others assume that he did the best he could and don't like it.  It probably never dawned on you that Rivera being a defensive guy purposely wanted a strong rushing attack and a passing attack that would move the chains, run the clock and score enough to win.  Sure every team wants to score 50 points a game but given the tools and emphasis, Shula likely did exactly what Rivera wanted him to do which is why no thought was given at all about replacing him.

 

I was all for Shula being OC.  100% behind him and I still am but our offense struggled mightily against good defenses.  While we will never march up and down the field against top notch defenses.  To go to the next step we have to be more potent than we are.    I have on many occasions posted that our low ranking offensively was based on our ball control style of offense.

 

While you may disagree with my outlook on Shula I am fully aware of how our offense is run and the philosophy Rivera wants to employ. You don't like my opinion it is your right to say so but try and keep your attempts to degrade my intelligence and knowledge of this team because you don't agree out of the discussion. TO ASSUME I don't because I believe we need to be better offensively and the onus is on Shula is just as bad as you saying anything about this team DAWNED on me.

 

Shula benefited from a great defense.  Only Gettleman knows how much of that defense we will have next year.  Will it be Top 5 again?  Shula better hope so if he plans on duplicating 12 wins.   Our defense carried us and Cam stepped up and brought us back to 4th quarter wins.   

 

Maybe saying he is under a microscope is a bit harsh but to say he is didn't benefit from the amazing Cam Newton and a great defense is being a bit too optimistic.  

 

That coming from one of the more optimistic members of this forum..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was all for Shula being OC.  100% behind him and I still am but our offense struggled mightily against good defenses.  While we will never march up and down the field against top notch defenses.  To go to the next step we have to be more potent than we are.    I have on many occasions posted that our low ranking offensively was based on our ball control style of offense.

 

While you may disagree with my outlook on Shula I am fully aware of how our offense is run and the philosophy Rivera wants to employ. You don't like my opinion it is your right to say so but try and keep your attempts to degrade my intelligence and knowledge of this team because you don't agree out of the discussion. TO ASSUME I don't because I believe we need to be better offensively and the onus is on Shula is just as bad as you saying anything about this team DAWNED on me.

 

Shula benefited from a great defense.  Only Gettleman knows how much of that defense we will have next year.  Will it be Top 5 again?  Shula better hope so if he plans on duplicating 12 wins.   Our defense carried us and Cam stepped up and brought us back to 4th quarter wins.   

 

Maybe saying he is under a microscope is a bit harsh but to say he is didn't benefit from the amazing Cam Newton and a great defense is being a bit too optimistic.  

 

That coming from one of the more optimistic members of this forum..

What teams did great against Good defenses besides perhaps Manning and Brady.  If you count the 49ers in the playoffs we faced 10 teams with defenses in the top half of the league which was tops among all teams I believe.   So to assume that Shula was even a big issue is over the top in my opinion.

 

And who said he didn't benefit from a great defense or having Cam.  And who said that he didn't need to improve in areas like redzone offense or even some playcalling.

 

Why does everything here seem to exist as a win-lose and black or white concrete issue when most things are just shades of grey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...