Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calvin Pryor


ajax4132

Recommended Posts

This isn't going to happen. Sorry for  safety wanting fans but,with Godfrey likely to on the roster not to mention lester and mitchell and maybe mikell likely to return. The  Need just isn't there. were losing all receivers ginn,lafell hix and so on. Not to mention the big hol on toffensive line. It's just not really possible and would be a black eye to the franchise(and cam) if this were to happen. END.

 

Not sure what you're talking about.

 

Gman didnt draft Godfrey and with a bad contract + injury he could likely be gone. At this point, no one can assume that Mitchell and Mikell are locks. There's a high chance that Mitchell is back, but not an aging Mikell. Lester played well as an udfa, but I'm not sure Rivera feels comfortable with him being the starter just yet.

 

For whatever I know, Rivera was linked to two "safeties" in consecutive years: Mark Barron (2012) and Kenny Vaccaro (2013). I'm pretty sure that Rivera will take a hard look at Pryor during the draft process. Atm, safety is as big a need as everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what you're talking about.

 

Gman didnt draft Godfrey and with a bad contract + injury he could likely be gone. At this point, no one can assume that Mitchell and Mikell are locks. There's a high chance that Mitchell is back, but not an aging Mikell. Lester played well as an udfa, but I'm not sure Rivera feels comfortable with him being the starter just yet.

 

For whatever I know, Rivera was linked to two "safeties" in consecutive years: Mark Barron (2012) and Kenny Vaccaro (2013). I'm pretty sure that Rivera will take a hard look at Pryor during the draft process. Atm, safety is as big a need as everything else.

 

Godfrey's contract is so big that if we were were cut we would leave 5 million in cap on the table as dead money. That said cutting him isn't realistic. Add to the fact mitchell played at a pro bowl level he likely returns as well. With lester there in the wings Signing a safety in the first round isn't realistic Even if we factor in mikell is gone(no word yet). Just not gonna happen unless mitchell walks even then i dout the team is uncomfortable with lester where as to draft a safety to play ahead of him in the first. Godfrey staying pretty much messes up the whole idea of that which is why NO ONE has mocked a safety to us. This would be about as likely as us drafting a RB in the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't going to happen. Sorry for safety wanting fans but,with Godfrey likely to on the roster not to mention lester and mitchell and maybe mikell likely to return. The Need just isn't there. were losing all receivers ginn,lafell hix and so on. Not to mention the big hole on the offensive line. It's just not really possible and would be a black eye to the franchise(and cam) if this were to happen. END.

uhhhh.... we don't draft by "need."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to have Pryor here.. 

 

Have Pryor start at SS and resign Mitchell to play FS

 

I agree that Pryor would be a great choice for us @ #28. However, if Mike Mitchell were re-signed, he would likely man the SS spot while Pryor would be a potential starter @ FS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Godfrey's contract is so big that if we were were cut we would leave 5 million in cap on the table as dead money. That said cutting him isn't realistic. Add to the fact mitchell played at a pro bowl level he likely returns as well. With lester there in the wings Signing a safety in the first round isn't realistic Even if we factor in mikell is gone(no word yet). Just not gonna happen unless mitchell walks even then i dout the team is uncomfortable with lester where as to draft a safety to play ahead of him in the first. Godfrey staying pretty much messes up the whole idea of that which is why NO ONE has mocked a safety to us. This would be about as likely as us drafting a RB in the first.

 

With what the Aints just did, it's not a shock if Godfrey isnt back. Making Godfrey a June 1 cut will free up around  $4-5mil. Dont see why we Gman wouldnt cut him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With what the Aints just did, it's not a shock if Godfrey isnt back. Making Godfrey a June 1 cut will free up around  $4-5mil. Dont see why we Gman wouldnt cut him.

From what i understand cutting him would free up about 2 million while leaving us stuck with a 5 million dollar cap hit. For a team trying to resign two high level stars(Cam,Hardy). I don't see how we can leave 5 million dollars going to waste just  to cut a position of need and then draft a player at the same position. Just isn't very logical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i understand cutting him would free up about 2 million while leaving us stuck with a 5 million dollar cap hit. For a team trying to resign two high level stars(Cam,Hardy). I don't see how we can leave 5 million dollars going to waste just  to cut a position of need and then draft a player at the same position. Just isn't very logical.

 

No, it would free up close to 5mil as a June 1 cut.

Also, not sure if Hardy is coming back. Def think that he's not getting a long term contract. If anything, a franchise tag. We'll be in better position next season and the year after that. We should have no problem signing Cam, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you should go that far and make such a bold statement about Moncrief being a 3rd rounder.

Show me one person that has in in the 1st? haven't seen him in the second either. He will run around a 4.6 and land in the 3rd round is the idea i've been getting from reading scouting reports and so on. Right now matthews and cooks look to land in the second round range as well so its hard to see him in the same league as those 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely taken a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...