Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith or Hakeem Nicks.


MV%doe

  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Smitty or Nicks

    • Nicks
      20
    • Smitty
      78
    • Trade up for jonny football and make him a WR
      11
    • Neither resign Edwards
      11


Recommended Posts

Gabbert only played 3 games last year.

Ponder completed 64% of his passes, which is 7% better than Eli, & he had a much better TD-t/o ratio.

I'll give you Geno, he sucked.

Point remains, Steve played with a Pro Bowler last year & Hakeem played with one of the absolute worst QBs in the league. And their production was very similar.

Only an idiot would rather have Smith going forward. It has nothing to do with Steve's past. Him being the greatest panther isn't gonna win games going forward.

A big, physical 26yo with elite WR skills would.

Well I guess I am an idiot with company. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera and Gman are going to move SS89 to the slot..  I feel it in my gut...  they are going to evaluate and come to the conclusion that we have all known for the last two years,  that 89 is no longer a legit #1 WR.                        

This off-season will revolve around finding a legit #1 WR and building a solid Oline.            So..... Nicks and it's not even close.    Nicks or any other #1 WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How hard must it be for a qb to try and hit a short wr that can no longer get open?

 

 

Also,  would give anything if we could get a time machine and pluck 24 yr old SS89 out of the past and bring him to the present for Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How hard must it be for a qb to try and hit a short wr that can no longer get open?

Also, would give anything if we could get a time machine and pluck 24 yr old SS89 out of the past and bring him to the present for Cam.

Could he not get open or did Cam overthrow him?...hmmm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny because I've actually pondered this very scenario. (Losing Smith and signing Nicks that is) & I've been on the bring Nicks home train since watching him back in 2011, tbh. But even w/ that being said there is no way in hell I would be happy w/ losing Smith in order to get him. Ecsp after the last 2 questionable seasons he's had. Don't get me wrong having him here would be amazing because i believe all he needs is a change if scenery to get back on track. But I think Smith would play a big prt in tht. He says he grew up watching & admiring Smith & idet HE would say he's the better wr.

 

 

youre doing it wrong, youre suppose to close your mind and poo all over the question. i felt as another poster, smitty for this year but future nicks.......but after a few days, future is now. the smitty love is too much for some to consider nicks.

 

 

o fraud batman, troll on bub, troll on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

youre doing it wrong, youre suppose to close your mind and poo all over the question. i felt as another poster, smitty for this year but future nicks.......but after a few days, future is now. the smitty love is too much for some to consider nicks.

o fraud batman, troll on bub, troll on.

most of this post didn't even make sense to me but the prt I did make out & actually agreed w/ was the prt tht said "Smitty for now & Hakeem for the future". That is 100% what I think the plan should be. Hakeem comes & plays along side him for a yr & then takes over for the future. But I have no reason to believe nicks is ready to be #1 RIGHT AWAY.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of this post didn't even make sense to me but the prt I did make out & actually agreed w/ was the prt tht said "Smitty for now & Hakeem for the future". That is 100% what I think the plan should be. Hakeem comes & plays along side him for a yr & then takes over for the future. But I have no reason to believe nicks is ready to be #1 RIGHT AWAY.

 

 

i presuppose a question and got a huddle welcome, hence they poo on the question during the first 20 some posting. fraud batman is try-hard troll.  its a tough question, smitty or a younger #1/2 like WR? in a sense its not, the answer is almost always younger, but nicks didnt catch that x clown against st louis in 2003 etc etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...