Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers work out WR, Robert Herron. Speedy, but that's about it right now.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Undrafted? Yea right. The kid wont get pass the 4th.

If he does get drafted in the first 4 rounds it won't be by us.  We don't need a project who can't contribute right away.  And look at the analysis at the top of this thread and tell me he isn't a project.  He is not stout enough or physical enough to do much this year.  He is not someone you can count on which is why he would only be useful to us in the later rounds or as an undrafted guy we are not pinning our hopes on.  Anyone who takes him high better be set at WR for the the next couple of years already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he does get drafted in the first 4 rounds it won't be by us.  We don't need a project who can't contribute right away.  And look at the analysis at the top of this thread and tell me he isn't a project.  He is not stout enough or physical enough to do much this year.  He is not someone you can count on which is why he would only be useful to us in the later rounds or as an undrafted guy we are not pinning our hopes on.  Anyone who takes him high better be set at WR for the the next couple of years already.

 

IMO, if we land our premier WR in the 1st or 2nd, grabbing Herron to be our future Y or Z receiver would be fine.  Picking at the end of the 3rd is like picking in the beginning of the 4th.  I don't remember word for word the analysis on Smitty coming out of Utah, but IIRC, he was projected to be an electric spark, but wasn't going to contribute immediately.  PR/KR and eventually a contributing WR in the offense..... doubt highly that they expected what Smith turned into back when he was drafted.  Seems similar to the reports and analysis of Herron so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, if we land our premier WR in the 1st or 2nd, grabbing Herron to be our future Y or Z receiver would be fine.  Picking at the end of the 3rd is like picking in the beginning of the 4th.  I don't remember word for word the analysis on Smitty coming out of Utah, but IIRC, he was projected to be an electric spark, but wasn't going to contribute immediately.  PR/KR and eventually a contributing WR in the offense..... doubt highly that they expected what Smith turned into back when he was drafted.  Seems similar to the reports and analysis of Herron so far. 

I don't see Herron as analogous to Smitty regarding draft potential.  Smith was projected to be an impact player in the return game right away but as you say the receiver part has been a tremendous bonus.  Herron on the other hand was not a returner and is projected by some to be a Jacoby Ford type player who we could pick up right now for the vet minimum.  He is a track guy with suspect receiver skills at this point.  Hardly someone to draft when we have a guy like Underwood already if all we want is a guy to go deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he does get drafted in the first 4 rounds it won't be by us.  We don't need a project who can't contribute right away.  And look at the analysis at the top of this thread and tell me he isn't a project.  He is not stout enough or physical enough to do much this year.  He is not someone you can count on which is why he would only be useful to us in the later rounds or as an undrafted guy we are not pinning our hopes on.  Anyone who takes him high better be set at WR for the the next couple of years already.

 

He's not a project. Fans want to think that every small school players are projects, they're not. Herron performed well during the Senior Bowl week. He ran some good routes and showed very good hands there. Herron is a guy that could potentially come in and produce right away in the slot.

 

I'm not saying that he's Mike Wallace, but he's one of those guy that will be a mid-late round pick who could produce right away as a rookie; Wallace, Andre Ellington, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very different perspective from the national football post below. Goes counter to stated traits previously mentioned in this threads

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/NFL-Prospect-Focus-Jimmie-Ward-and-Robert-Herron.html

"Robert Herron – Wide Receiver – Wyoming

Size – 5087 – 193 – 4.48

Strong Points – Athlete, speed, hands, adjust to ball, pass routes, run after catch, compete in traffic, had a strong senior bowl week

Weak Points – Size, can only be a slot at the next level

2013 Stats: 72 catches for 937 yards and nine touchdowns

Summation – Herron is a fourth-year senior and a three-year starter. As a freshman, he played both wide receiver and running back. He has only recently become a receiver (2011 season). In high school, Herron was not only a very good football player, but was also a top track athlete with personal bests of 10.5 in the 100 meters and 20.99 in the 200 meters.

Herron plays both inside and out at Wyoming. He is used on a variety of routes including bubble screens, outs, slants, and crossing routes. With his speed, he is also used deep.

Herron may be short, but he is not small, he has a solid build to go along with very good strength (18 reps of 225 at the Combine). He is quick off the ball and does a very good job of both working through and avoiding jams. He is quick into his routes and has the flexibility to drop his hips and get in and out of a cut quickly. With his body control and quick feet, he is effective with multi-cut routes. He consistently gets open on both short and deep routes.

He has good hands and can track the ball and make the difficult catch. He shows the courage to compete for the ball in traffic. After the catch, he is an instinctive and strong runner who has the ability to make people miss in space. His run skills allow him to turn a short pass into a long gain.

If Herron were two inches taller, we would be talking about him as a premium round draft pick. His height will likely limit him to being a slot receiver, but he can be very effective in that role. I can see him being used as a club's primary slot very early in his career. While he has not been a returner in college, he has the traits to be a good NFL return man. Herron should be a solid third round pick, fourth round at worst.

Grade B 6.6"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not a project. Fans want to think that every small school players are projects, they're not. Herron performed well during the Senior Bowl week. He ran some good routes and showed very good hands there. Herron is a guy that could potentially come in and produce right away in the slot.

 

I'm not saying that he's Mike Wallace, but he's one of those guy that will be a mid-late round pick who could produce right away as a rookie; Wallace, Andre Ellington, etc.

He is a project and not the best guy we could get at that spot.  I would rather take a TE than a WR if that is the best we could do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a project and not the best guy we could get at that spot. I would rather take a TE than a WR if that is the best we could do.

Do not agree that he's a project. Go watch his cut-ups, nothing told me that Herron is raw. He looks more polished than some WRs in this class (Robinson, Richardson). In the 3rd, sure I agree I would rather take a TE (CJ Fied). In the 4th, would take him in a heartbeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...