Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I THINK the Panthers will seek trade for new DT


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

I doubt a trade is possible. We have no 1st round pick and we have little cap space.

Well it doesn't have to be a first round player, Kemo wasn't.

We just need a big DT who occupies more than 1 blocker and pushed the pile. That essentially was exactly what Kemo was.

We don't need Brayton at DT, guess why? Cause he's not a DT, yet alone one that possess any of the characteristics I listed above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it doesn't have to be a first round player, Kemo wasn't.

We just need a big DT who occupies more than 1 blocker and pushed the pile. That essentially was exactly what Kemo was.

We don't need Brayton at DT, guess why? Cause he's not a DT, yet alone one that possess any of the characteristics I listed above.

You make it sound so simple. No team is gonna let a massive DT go for less then a 1st round pick. 2 gap players dont come around all that often and thats why they are payed so much. Much of the second tier DTs are 1 gap players not 2 gap like Kemo is. Brayton would not be a good run stopping DT cause of his size and that was proven in Oakland. He can come in as a 1 gap on passing downs but that about as far as it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You make it sound so simple. No team is gonna let a massive DT go for less then a 1st round pick. 2 gap players dont come around all that often and thats why they are payed so much. Much of the second tier DTs are 1 gap players not 2 gap like Kemo is. Brayton would not be a good run stopping DT cause of his size and that was proven in Oakland. He can come in as a 1 gap on passing downs but that about as far as it goes.

I never said acquiring one would be easy, but one can be had for less than a 1st rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brayton is a situational DT at best in Trgo's scheme (and Fox's for that matter). You gotta have some beef.

There is speculation however that beef may not be best suited for what they are trying to do this season and if so Tyler may be well suited for Meeks dline that we have yet to see.

No sense in having a melt down.... There is nothing you can do about injuries and nothing positive will come out of this if everyone thinks it's utter doom from heree on out. I like the optimism here about using what we have and maybe acquiring some depth instead of a starter. Use what we have. Let the staff mold what Meeks wants. Rotate the hell out of them and play some small ball defense when needed and make it work.

It's called coaching. The guy who wins because he has the best talent every year is not necessarily the best coach. We need good coaches and coaches that prove they can survive these type injuries/losses. We are never going to be immune to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ, Brayton, Lewis, Peppers.....that isn't the kind of front 4 imo you can rely on for most of your pressure w/o someone taking a big step. Maybe CJ can do that....I think Brayton would be serviceable at DT but nothing more. Regardless, they at least need to sign a vet b/c there is no way Lewis and Brayton will make it 16 games each. imo.

Since you seem verry opinionated this come as no suprise... CJ can be a Rucker type DE he had 6 sacks in spot duty he can get ten as a starter with Brown rotating in..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, me and my friend, who likes the Raiders, came up with a trade deal. I know that it most likely won't happen, but it sounded good to us.

A 3rd and Keydrick Vincent for Terdell Sands.

We have Duke who can take Vincent's place and Keith Gray to be a backup. It'll help us out alot at DT too. They need OL help and Vincent will help them.

So, what do you think? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, me and my friend, who likes the Raiders, came up with a trade deal. I know that it most likely won't happen, but it sounded good to us.

A 3rd and Keydrick Vincent for Terdell Sands.

We have Duke who can take Vincent's place and Keith Gray to be a backup. It'll help us out alot at DT too. They need OL help and Vincent will help them.

So, what do you think? :D

pruane2forever.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vincent was one of our best olineman before he went down.

I don't think we mess with the continuity of the line if we don't have to.

Raiders need o-line help, we need d-line help. Yeah i know all 5 of our guys were good and solid last year on the o-line, but DT is the weakest on the team. And we have a younger player in Duke that can fill Vincent's spot. Plus he'll be building experience. Then Sands would make DT alot better than it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...