All Activity

I'm not buying they are all in on Young. If they are we have bigger problems than a short qb.

Wasn't it though. Maybe some have their nose.........

An old nemesis is set to return.

Ditto... Wouldn't mind adding Sam Howell (his skill set fits wwll with Canales scheme) but I doubt he'd be considered competition for the starting role.

There's no way they could have gone through this season looking at the qb room and say, nah fam we good. I refuse to believe that.

I don't think they're" just saying"... Like it or not, it's all real

I could go for that.

plan?

You referenced us following a "Cardinals type plan"

Let's see how FA shakes out - I think our Panthers tax will be a lot lighter this year, along with player interest. Hopefully our offseason shakes out to BPA possibilities

My response to pretty much everybody who's talking about "competition" It ain't happenin' next year It could happen the following season, but only if Bryce has a bad fourth year. So if you're pinning any hope whatsoever on any potential QB competition for the 2026 season? Well, sorry but...

This too. It must be nice to be a well run organization.

Improved is true. Good is a different thing. I think that is the issue, he has improved to "not very good" from "really bad." Are we to assume this progression continues? If so, it probably means 2-3 more seasons before we see "franchise caliber" QB play on a consistent basis. And I really don't think anyone buys into that notion of consistent improvement at this point.

I understand having a plan B. I just don't think they are actively looking for his replacement at this time.

I would throw in the Cardinals game, the Bills game...hell pick any of his stinkers. They all are ugly.

Or letting desperate teams trade up and give you day 2 picks and you still draft the guy you wanted anyway.

I don't know. I think Coen has done a pretty good job down there.

Yeah, I'd honestly rather be sitting on Bryce with no major future commitment than Lawrence on a franchise QB contract. The former situation gives you options, you're pretty much stuck with the status quo for the foreseeable future in the latter.

Oh absolutely. There's a spectrum of how heavily it weighs. Team boards always keep this in mind when they're building their boards and tier-boxing.

If you're going to post comparisons, you should post them all. If you take the time to look, you can see he has improved in pretty much every catagory: TD%, TD-INT ratio, succ% (passes going for 1st downs), yards/game, adjust yards gained per pass attempt, 4th qtr comeback, game winning drives etc.

I am kind of amazed that the organization still believes. It definitely shakes any remaining faith of a turnaround, that's for sure. Of course there is an element of, "well what do you expect them to say?"

?

Brooks had plenty of time. ACL rehabs shouldn’t take that long these days. There was a botch in there somewhere, but I doubt more time was the answer.

Neither do I... Also not a big Trevor Lawrence fan either. The "bigger and stronger" thing is probably the main appeal there.

I think need is always factored into the BPA equation. I mean, of course every team is always going to claim their draft pick was the BPA on their board. It's not like a team is ever going to admit that they passed on perceived better talent to take a player based on need but I think "BPA" really means "BPA for our team" and that factors in things like roster need, scheme fit, etc. that aren't necessarily related to pure talent level.