Jump to content

ECHornet

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    1,937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ECHornet

  1. Actually, the first TD to Harrison wasn’t on Ringo. It was zone coverage and Harrison beat the safety #24.
  2. Ringo hasn’t been on him for all of his completions. Also, the TD he conceded was more on the DL whiffing multiple times. That said, Harrison Jr is a beast and should be a top 3 pick next year.
  3. This is starting to feel like the Orange Bowl. Michigan, like Clemson, has squandered many opportunities to put up more points close to goal. In the end, Tennessee pulled away once the Clemson defense caved.
  4. You could have just accepted my poo emoji and carried on. lol I’m not interested in squabbling about it either. That was just my way of saying I disagree with the take. Hopefully McCarthy has a solid 2nd half so this game gets interesting. Cheers
  5. If you find an article or info that has McCarthy in that tier, I’d be happy to read it. I’ve seen them both play quite a bit, and I don’t see it.
  6. I think you must have quoted the wrong post earlier. You insinuated I think Darnold is better than Young, which is incorrect. Maybe that was intended for someone else.
  7. You couldn’t be more wrong. I’ve been saying Young is QB #1 and even posted today I was wondering what it would take to trade up to get him. Just saying it’s not as simple as Young vs Darnold. We will have to give up considerable assets to be in position to draft Young.
  8. Not sad. Just giving a poo post the credit it deserves. No one except you and Michigan fans think McCarthy is on Maye/Williams level. ETA: Actually, most Michigan fans would think that’s a poo take too.
  9. Those comparing Young and Darnold need to include what it would take for us to acquire Young. Likely looking at… Young vs Darnold + 3 1st round draft picks
  10. Here’s to Stroud dropping to our 2nd round pick! Highly improbable, but I can’t still root for it. I was thinking last night what it might take to get the Texans off #1 for Young. Would they go for Burns + 2 1sts? Probably not. Not sure I’d want that anyway with Darnold playing decent and the 2024 crop of QBs looking strong.
  11. This is tough because SO much of my plan could change over the next couple/few games. Darnold could make a me a believer in his ability to be a top 20 QB and I’d offer a 2-3 year deal around 8-10mil per with an out before the last year. Could be our bridge or more. Wilks could make me a believer that a replacement would crush the locker room. How can we hire Steichen who apparently can be a bit awkward when the players are all rallying for Wilks who’s showing great leadership skills. Those two decisions alone would alter too much to say definitively what my plan would be. Just winning the division may not provide enough info. There’s a possibility we could beat the Bucs and look terrible in a loss to the Saints while still winning the division. TBD for me, but this will be a fun excercise two games from now.
  12. If he’s available in the 6th/7th, I’m taking him without blinking. Running to turn in the pick, and I’m a Tar Heel fan. Wilson/Ingle/Thomas are all worth late round selections, if available, off that defense. Injury history, size, and athleticism respectively may have them available in the last couple of rounds.
  13. Would y’all want to pair a Kingsbury/Hackett with a HC Wilks or stick with McAdoo?
  14. Steichen/Johnson + two 3rd round picks in consecutive years if Wilks is hired elsewhere or Hire Wilks who the players love Tough call. At least we have some decent options.
  15. I’m curious as to what your subjective view of a QB “playing well” is.
  16. Excuses for what? He’s played well so far this year.
  17. Seems a logical way to think about it. How many years does Darnold have left in his career and do you see him progressing or regressing/maintaining from here. We’ll likely get a decent idea over the next few weeks.
  18. Im in as long as Richardson isn’t taken with our first two picks. Ideally 3rd or later.
  19. Darnold haters refer to him as a 5th year QB. Darnold backers refer to him as a 25 year old QB. Interesting. Darnold’s career path had him developing in the NFL during his low twenties. A QB like Pickett is just getting started in the NFL at 24. Ask yourself if you would be satisfied with Pickett being our future QB if he’d taken over for Mayfield/Walker and performed the same as Darnold. I think most would be at minimum cautiously optimistic in that case.
  20. I get it. I’ve seen many 1st rd TEs fail to meet expectations, but if you think there’s a Gronk or Kelce caliber talent, you would and should make that pick every time. Our biggest holes on offense are QB and TE, and if we’re picking where I think we will, the 1st round worthy QBs will be gone. I don’t mind drafting a project QB later in the draft, but I’d rather secure our other biggest need. I’ve read Mayer is as close to Gronk potential at TE seen in a while. I’ve only watched two games of his and I believe it.
  21. RD 1: Michael Mayer, TE - Notre Dame RD 2(a): Best defensive front 7 player available RD 2(b): Zay Flowers, WR - Boston College Rock with Darnold/MC/3rd or later rookie QB in 2023 and if none emerge as a legitimate top 15 starter, push in all your chips for the 2024 QB class.
  22. BBoze has a career earnings amount just north of 5mil. It would seem a little crazy to double that per year at his age. I think a 3 year/ 18-23 mil type deal could get it done.
  23. Then the Bucs would have to drop one more to either the Cardinals or Falcons. It’s absolutely nutty that we still control our own destiny.
  24. You have to when you run for 5 yards through two drives, and the Steelers are selling out to stop it.
×
×
  • Create New...