ForJimmy

Can’t Erving also play C and G?

I’d love Sewell. Instant plug and play.

What about Waddle in the first as your slot and a LT in the second in a deep class? Bouye, Melvin, Jackson, and Pride are decent CBs, although another one certainly wouldn’t hurt. G/CB/DT/FS are all options in the 3rd IMO.

I don’t know why it always gets me all pumped up!

I’d prefer Sewell, but if he isn’t there along with Fields I wouldn’t be terribly upset with one of the big 3 WRs. I think they are the elite talent in this draft. I’m not sure I would consider any CB in this draft elite. If we trade down I’d feel much better about a CB. I think as far as elite talent goes there is Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Sewell, Pitts, Chase, Smith, and Waddle with Slater being pretty close and Lance having the most potential. I’d be happy with any of the elite 8 and ok with the other two at well.

I won’t be upset with Sewell at all! The man was made to play LT.

Yeah, right before the draft....

Picking the strength of schedule to answer how hard his schedule is would be cherry picking? The ACC team that was ranked so high was Notre Dame and Lawrence did not play them the first time and the still beat them with a true freshman because Clemson is THAT much better than other ACC teams. You also need to look at the schedule for each team not just the conference as a whole as they don’t always play every team in there conference. If only there was a stat that compared schedules of each team.... Like I said Fields had the top strength of schedule like it or not. Plus he played Clemson AND Alabama in the end.

They are talking about his throwing motion how his elbow rises above his wrist. I mean it’s really reaching and insanely coachable/correctable. He looked like he already corrected it during his second pro day. If he falls and we grab it it’s a win in my books.

I like that his name is Frankie. Reminds me of a mobster...

For cheap I’m down! I’m referring to Richardson......

Yeah made up reasons.

Just let it happen. I heard he hates Puppies and is a loud chewer! Let’s all go tweet it!

He had the top Stength of Schedule of of these QBs and lower recruiting rankings than Clemson and Alabama these past two years. Lawrence with Clemson against the ACC would make up a huge talent difference. I guess some people just don’t like Fields so they make up nonsense stars to discredit him.

Texas Tech QBs were system babies too. Until Mahomes got drafted.

“proven” would be the key work from my quote. They have stated that a QB isn’t out of the question and are attending Pro Days for these players. Sure you can call it smokescreens, but we haven’t been too secretive about much lately. Especially our need to get rid of Teddy.

Lol I know right. He is a system baby, but he also underperformed. He is throwing every excuse out there, true or not.

Even Mac?!

All in is ignoring options to upgrade the position. This is dangerous on a QB who has already had issues in the league, but I do see some potential. Taking a QB that falls to 8 and letting them compete with Darnold is not “all in”. It’s more of a BPA position. Unless you have a proven franchise player at that position you should always be open to upgrading the position.

Yeah either way they get Fields or Wilson, but I could see them being higher on one than they other. If Mac is the one left standing at 8, I would be happy to trade down. Definitely not sold on him...

That makes sense. They don’t want the Jets high on Fields.

I keep hearing this as well. But why smokescreen when they already have the number 3 pick locked up knowing who is going one and two? It would be like the Jets smoke screening with Wilson.

If they are “all in” on Darnold that’s a dangerous game. If a better option is available always pursue it, especially at the QB position. I just don’t see a future 2nd and a couple late round picks as being fully committed to that player.

Oh you didn’t hear? We have to have a complete roster with no weaknesses before we dare take a rookie QB. I’ve been saying this the whole time. If we are high on a QB that falls to 8, I hope Darnold isn’t the reason we pass on one...

It’s the simple fact that we don’t have an established player at the most important position in sports. All I’m saying is if a player we like FALLS to us at 8, we should draft him. Not draft one just to do it. If we aren’t high on Mac or Lance and they are there at 8 than pass. If we are high on Fields and he actually makes it to 8 draft him. If our staff isn’t sold on him the grab a LT and I’ll be happy.