mrcompletely11

before i go ballistic, is this a troll tweet? https://x.com/ToddHamptonIII/status/1915448439149625826

If I was arguing for my career reputation I think I would be a touch more articulate then saying folks are "tripping". But thats just me

If he is there and Graham isnt picked you can bet your ass posters will be saying a lot worse about morgan

"consensus, conviction, upside..........."

When the margins are already razor thin then parting with an asset for less then it's worth is the epitome of getting fleeced

by definition that is getting fleeced

Ah boy. We cannot get out of our own way.

I dont think it works like that for various reasons

This. Not sure why this is so hard to understand. We need talent not more 3rd round picks or whatever morgan is trying to get. Trusting this FO to find a diamond in the rough in the middle of the draft is fuging laughable

Its fuging nuts how some posters are trying to pretzel their brain into logic that this is a good idea.

Jesus dude its not an overreaction its a discussion of said tweet in the opening post. I even copied the part I was referring to. And nobody is getting morgan fired simply saying trading back on a discount will be on the laundry list of reasons. Added under the brooks trade/pick etc. And no matter how talented or deep you think the draft is simply taking a discount on a top 10 pick for more middle round picks is fuging stupid, no matter how you try to slice it.

My understanding is they’re willing to take a discount to move down in an effort to try to build up their war chest of picks. Going off this part of the initial tweet, that is classic trading back just to trade back, getting less value then you normally would just for the sake of extra picks is monumentally stupid no matter how you have draft grading set up. Taking a discount for a top 10 pick is classic panthering and just another notch we will point to when Morgan is inevitably poo canned

This would be really unpopular but its certainly taking advantage of a situation but I would use a late 4rth or def a 5th on Bond. If it doesnt work so be it no biggie, but if it hits you score a big time player at a drastically reduced price

Then you dont trade if you are not getting equal value all things considered. Trading back just to trade back seems borderline moronic at this point.

Graham vs osu is a thing of legend

Well said

No. It absolutely doesn't make sense

Jesus christ we are an unserious organization

yeah I know I was just being stupid

offer a 5th

I can't even see a 4rth. A beat up 31 year old tackle that costs 31 million might get a 5th and that's a long shot imo

lol wut?

they would be certifiably insane to not address the oline with that pick

^ Is gantt transitioning?

Atlanta has the potential to be pretty good and Tampa has shown that they can be above average. Saints should be one of the worst if not worst teams in the nfl. So I think slowly the south is getting better and if Pennix improves there should be 2 average/above average teams in the NFC in our division. I figure we need two solid offseasons to get things right. i think the FA signings are more for depth then contributing star power.