Luciu5

Yes it can. Unless you consider Robbie Anderson someone of significance. It doesn't matter though. Be amazed by the cap next off season. Again. Just like the past 2 or 3 off seasons when "omg we can't sign anybody and we have to cut the whole team, oh mer gerd!" I just don't get how many off seasons have to go by where we sign or resign key players, acquire FA's and don't have to burn the roster to the ground for people to understand, at the very least, that managing the cap is more complex than it appears on paper, and to stop assuming there is no money. How many times do the 'we have no cap space' people have to be wrong before they decide to shut up and stop being wrong? Idk and also idgaf. I said what I said and y'all can cry and clutch your pearls over cap space if thats how you get off. Can lead a blind horse to water and all that.

That is rushing yards. I'm not sure if I'm confused by your question or if you were confused about my response. 2021 Panthers were.... 17th ranked defense for rushing yards allowed 8th ranked defense for yards per carry

17th - yards allowed 8th - YPC

I'm exaggerating obviously. You can't be a complete idiot with the cap. The entire team can't be paid 50M a year. This team can easily afford $35M/year for a QB though without cutting anyone of significance from this team.

$70M????? wtf? If Baker has a pro bowl level season, we will absolutely sign him long term. Undoubtedly. Those of you with cap concerns, get over it. The cap is a myth. This has been shown over and over again. Don't worry about cap space people.

It's Twitter. He didn't have to respond at all. You think he'd be cut or something if he ignored that tweet? I agree he wasnt going to be negative about Rhule at all, but still the idea that he has to stand up for his meal ticket is really kinda lame.

I don't know a single person that doesn't have Prime.

If that makes you feel better about me laughing at you. Either way, you still sound pathetic coming in a thread being a hypocrite. But you do you man. I just think it's funny.

I haven't watched yet. I won't be able to later today. So with that out of the way... Running the ball is crucial. Having a deep ball is crucial as well. If you don't have a deep ball, they will crowd the box. The defense has to be scared of getting beat deep. If you can't run the ball, they'll play cover 4 and shut you down over the top, blanket your receivers and blitz every down. They have to be scared of you gashing them on the ground. You have to make the defense pay both ways. You light them up in the air until they take it away. Then you run it down their throats. Football is a lot of rock paper scissors, like the way you use a screen pass to beat a blitz. Anyway, you can't play rock paper scissors if you only bring paper and scissors to the game.

Tampa Bay 5-11 5-11 7-9 -Tom Brady 11-5 13-4

If you don't like em don't click on them? Ya know, I could prolly do this all day.

Not sure if irony is the right word or hypocrisy.

After 4 games, PJ will go to the practice squad and it will be Baker and Darnold. Until then, we have Eason on the practice squad. I imagine Eason gets cut to move PJ over, though I think Eason could possibly be better than PJ. Either way, in a few weeks Darnold will be the backup. I don't think there is a better option than Darnold available. Anyone brought in would be at a disadvantage to Darnold simply because he knows the playbook and has been in the system now for several months.

I think it's possible. Pretty much what coffee said.

wtf are you smoking? and can you share?

We lose to the Lions? Personally, I think if we're going to lose the lions, we're going to lose a lot of those you listed as wins too.

I see as many as 12 wins just based off talent. As few as 2. It's just really hard to predict this team because of the way they fell off a cliff last year. Personally, I put a lot of that on Darnold. I'd say 8-10 wins is where we will end up. In Baker we trust.

IF Baker is worth a longer contract, which would mean we are drafting mid 1st instead of top 10, I could see it worth trading back. Not a huge drop off from 15 to 20, let's say. If we don't need a QB and don't need a LT, there is more flexibility I feel.

No.

If they felt the bottom of the roster needs churned, why didn't we pick up anyone off waivers?

I am on the fence when it comes to Bakers play, but I'm also very much a homer. That said, this "article" is just a blog. Nothing more than an extra long, glorified facebook post. Only difference I guess is the writer got paid something for it. Any Huddler could have written that.

I bet we are tryign to trade some players. I bet we have some practice squad players elevated once space is made for them. Hopefully they find some DEs somewhere.

Keep in mind we were 6th, which means we weren't interested in any of these. Edit - this comment now has a different meaning I guess.

I'm trying to figure out why was there a craze of cornerbacks on the radio

Do teams claim their own cuts off waivers or do they go through all 32 teams first?