Jump to content

csx

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    18,334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by csx

  1. Exactly. It's time. This is for entertainment not protecting your retirement investments.
  2. This is a challenge every team faces. Good coaching, drafting, creativity are the logical approaches. Load up on ways to stop overpriced mediocre players. Don't follow the trends
  3. Having a problem with the policy suggests one hasn't thought it through or one is just looking for something to have a problem with A team wouldn't hire a candidate just because of their race because they actually need to be good to get a promotion. There is no incentive to hire just because since then you aren't staffing in your best interests.
  4. Ive heard from several podcasts, etc that Watts didn't have a place yet. Odd considering it was stated as safeties since first leaked and confirmed when the team announced it officially.
  5. The obsession over the age of of the draft picks is so weird. Are you really trying to get 20 years out of these guys and anything else is a failure? Like if they are great but olay 1 or 2 fewer years is a problem?
  6. First I've heard this podcast. I love Stewart and having a player with genuine interest in giving a real take on things.
  7. He's been said to be below both of those. That won't be a surprise
  8. I'm interested in how the NTs and 3/4 DEs handle registration and orientation. These are vital to predicting success
  9. Surprise! Players are tall, fat, short, strong, fast, and agile.
  10. If we can get him at 9 I say go for it. Why not? Put this staff to work. They should be up to the task of sculpting him in to a pro. I'd rather do that than trade too far up.
  11. Exactly. "we want a good one who runs the offense and distributes the ball" is what everyone wants
  12. That's a pretty generic analogy. That's like saying the point guard is like the QB of the team. Of course
  13. Is there something in the cheese that turns their QBs in to head cases it n GB? That's just not happening.
  14. You perfectly as summed up what Carr is not coming and should not come here.
  15. Wouldn't surprise me if this mention was just done to drum up trade hype for him. Given we make a lot of trades and have been in the spotlight for hires recently
  16. I would guess the opposite. Very small percentage have long illustrious careers. Most all will have lasting physical issues
  17. The guys that founded the company are PhDs in cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology
  18. He's not getting signed here so it's all academic
  19. There's little to no chance the ownership or coaching staff is going to repeat the pattern that doomed bott the past 3 years
  20. He's a sure fire mediocre QB. Not what you want
  21. Teams wanted to trade for Stafford. There was a competition for him. Similar story doesn't mean they are on the same level. I don't think any team thinks so or he would have been acquired already
  22. I thought I typed not on level. I certainly meant to
  23. Carr is on on the level Stafford was. I think everyone knows or should know that.
×
×
  • Create New...