MHS831

I keep telling you folks, gonna be Mac Jones in round 1 (about 40% sure--maybe after a brief trade back, maybe at 8. He would be better that Bwater.

Actually, the OP is exactly right. Apparently, and I have researched this, Lirim owns a piano. 40-68% of the Huddle: Duck.

The good news? he may have just slipped into the top 7

Would you rather have him and a soon to be demanding contract--or any player who is available in EARLY round 2? A Panther second rounder is much more valuable than the Bucs second rounder, for example. So we have more value with our second rounder than most teams. This process removes negotiations, so NO.

My opinion is this--we can probably mark Lawrence and Wilson off the list. Wilson to the Jets is a given, however, they have a history of taking a player that shocks their fan base. Frankly, I would be surprised in Fields is in play--maybe if we could trade down to get Miami's spot, but at what cost? Lance has about a 40% chance of surviving desperation row, so I think we trade down for Lance or slide back a few spots--or not--and take Jones. Funny how mad people get when I mention Jones, but the reality is, and it has nothing to do with MHS's opinion, he is the most realistic QB available at 8.

In my mocks, it is hard to get a T after the second round. I can see the S in this defense, however. We have little back there if we play Chinn at LB. I think they probably feel that we at least have some bodies a LT this year.

I do not see the Texans holding on to him until the regular season---they have suitors now--end the drama, get the cloud above your head gone. We will see how they do. Front office idiocy.

In most civil cases, six jurors sit to hear a matter, although there may be as many as 12 jurors

You do realize that everyone was calling the lawyer screwy, right?

As much as I have been trying to mention this, the best move might just be to trade back 3-4 spots and take Mac Jones. (I know--everyone says he sucks but his numbers are elite--and I know you have that figured out as well---great offense--like Burrow and Trevor and Tua and even Lance and Fields and Wilson did not, in their own respective worlds.) Jones and adding pick might be wiser that Tua/Fields/Lance and losing a pick or two or three. However, some have written him off, but if you read the real QB experts and what they say about him---I do not think they agree. Jones probably does last beyond New England at 15. I could be wrong--but so could anyone who disagrees. Me? I will take the guy who won a championship and posted nearly 80% completion rates at an 11.2 yards per attempt clip. I like his processing speed and decision-making, and I like the fact that people who know the QB position like him.

Trade up into the early first round twice?

We have Arnold (6-6 225 lb TE) and Sullivan (6-5, 240 lb coverted WR to TE at LSU) are lesser versions of Pitts--so if we take a pass catching TE in round 1, I would expect heads to roll.

I am sure R. Anderson might be a good person to ask--as is Elfein.

No, his performance on his team was worse than Teddy's on the Panthers last year.

Lol! Well, since Limbaugh died, I assumed...

And it is equally immoral to denounce a person based on mere allegations. The point he was making? You support Trump when you KNOW he committed adultery and is currently being sued for rape. Epstien's friend. 30 or so accusers of more than Watson is being accused. And you don't want Watson based on one side of a questionable story (Watson's attorney to speak Monday). Is that an accurate assessment of your position on these two unrelated matters?

Don't expect facts here--at best you will get spewed misinformation and propaganda, but you are more likely to experience some "whatabout..." It is how Fox trains its viewers.

Regardless of whether or not the Texans are behind damaging their own goods, low-ball if you think his chances are good. We have only heard through the females' attorney, and his rep is questionable--let's hear from Watson's attorney. Me? If I am looking into this, it is a buyer's market. I would offer a deal contingent upon his playing time--So I would send them a #1 in 2022 now, voidable if he does not play. I would offer 2023 first rounder, and (if possible) the 2024 first rounder, assuming previous years were not voided. So give them NO first rounders in 2021--no players either.

Would not be surprised to see us keep the two tall pass catching TEs (Arnold, Sullivan) and Thomas and Thompson to play some blocking back/blocking TE roles. Since Armah is gone, they have a roster spot to keep 4

I think the TE position, like a few others, is going to surprise you. Brady is making his mark---he liked this guy (Arnold)--Sullivan is a converted WR at LSU that played TE as a SR--the guy Fits signed from Seattle. Both are tall, lean pass-catching TEs. Maybe Thomas and Thompson can block, but I think we have something we did not have last year....

The theme is versatility--just about every player could play somewhere else effectively. Roster spots, minimizing the need to sub...etc.

Another player from a school I have never heard of--- 6'6" 220. Probably plays outside more than tight.

Yes. Good point. It sure does.

I liked Moore too--you have to let the Huddle comics post their ???? comments. They would turn down a date with Barbara Fialho because they have never heard of her. Then the analysis starts. Very nice signing.

So you have to know that if you move up and miss, as a first year GM, YIKES. He will be bold---and I think they would give up the second rounder for the QB--which may be why we signed Scott and Ewing---popcorn.