Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fantasy football ranks and CAR


CAPantherFan

Recommended Posts

I think any QB in the first round means you suck at fantasy football. Only one you could make an argument for right now would be Peyton, and I personally still wouldn't take him.

Agreed, dominated my way to a championship this year on the back of Andy Dalton, who I picked up in one of the last rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't disagree more. Reed, Olsen and Rudolph will be the 2nd tier and all after that will be mediocre at best. And Gronk?? I wouldn't even draft him in the 7th round if he were there.

2 things:

1) You're forgetting something about Gronk. When hes out, its not like you're without a TE. You still have tons of value on the waiver wire. So you're getting 8 weeks of elite value out of Gronk, then 8 weeks of average value out of whoever u pick up. (I dont draft Gronk either cuz i hate the guy. But his numbers + replacement value numbers are there).

2) dude dont fall for Rudolph. Hes WAAAAAY to TD dependent. Hes only topped 60 yards in 3 games over the past 2 years. Due to the TDs, hes still in that TE 4-12 group for sure, but he's way to limited to "lead" that second tier .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm about as big of a football geek as I know, but fantasy football has always just been beyond stupid to me. Any system that devalues the QB so much while massively inflating the value of RBs is just way out of touch with the modern NFL.

Huh?

Devalues?

You must have stopped playing fantasy back in 2006. 16 out of the top 19 top scorers last year were QBs. The 16th rated QB outscored the #1 WR. And only 5 of the top 30 scorers were RBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 things:

1) You're forgetting something about Gronk. When hes out, its not like you're without a TE. You still have tons of value on the waiver wire. So you're getting 8 weeks of elite value out of Gronk, then 8 weeks of average value out of whoever u pick up. (I dont draft Gronk either cuz i hate the guy. But his numbers + replacement value numbers are there).

2) dude dont fall for Rudolph. Hes WAAAAAY to TD dependent. Hes only topped 60 yards in 3 games over the past 2 years. Due to the TDs, hes still in that TE 4-12 group for sure, but he's way to limited to "lead" that second tier .

2 things...

First, I don't agree. You can get someone who'll put up twice as many points than anyone on the waiver wire. And in my first post I accidentally forgot Julius Thomas who is first tier. And part of the reason I'd never draft Gronk is because I hate him too.

Second, two words.... Norv. Turner. The TE God. Look at Cameron Jordan last year? Rudolph is 5x as good as Cameron and he'll have a better QB than the scrubs on Cleveland. Not to mention the Vikings' defense is worse and they'll be playing from behind needing to pass. Jordan will do nothing this year, and Rudolph will definitely be a top 5 TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 things...

First, I don't agree. You can get someone who'll put up twice as many points than anyone on the waiver wire. And in my first post I accidentally forgot Julius Thomas who is first tier. And part of the reason I'd never draft Gronk is because I hate him too.

Second, two words.... Norv. Turner. The TE God. Look at Cameron Jordan last year? Rudolph is 5x as good as Cameron and he'll have a better QB than the scrubs on Cleveland. Not to mention the Vikings' defense is worse and they'll be playing from behind needing to pass. Jordan will do nothing this year, and Rudolph will definitely be a top 5 TE.

 

Gronk finished in the top 15 last year, and the dude missed 9 full games. He played less than half a season. He averaged 13 points per game when he played, which is more than the guy you just said would be in the 1st tier (Julius Thomas - who averaged only 10 per game). Vernon Davis, who finished last year as the #2 TE, also finished averaging under 10 points per game. Will Gronk play all 16 games next year? Unlikely. But Besides Graham, he had the most points per game out of all TE's, so playing him for half (usually more than half) of the year, and playing replacement value the rest of the way, will still net you top 3 value. 

 

Example, if you take a guy who still finished BEHIND Gronk last year, Brent Celek (who finished 17th in TE and was owned in under 10% of leagues last year), and used him the weeks Gronk was out 1-6 and 15-17, you would have ended up with 132 fantasy points from your TE. Thats better than all but 3 TE's in the league last year. And as I mentioned before, thats with Gronk missing 9 full games, and leaving another one early.

 

I hate Gronk. I won't draft him because I don't want to root for him. So this feels weird that im defending him, but the numbers dont lie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...