Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Receivers


mako1552

Recommended Posts

I think Moore's a decent receiver, but I just don't see him making it over Carter or Robinson. Has Moore got any potential returning?

It's likely Goodson will be considered our fourth or fifth receiver, even if he doesn't take that roster spot.

Here's how I see it:

Smith, Muhammad, Jarrett, Robinson, Goodson.

Note that either Goodson or Robinson here could likely return for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore is good, but he wont make it over Carter or even Beavers. I think that Beavers might actually surprise some ppl and make it over Moores spot on the pratice squad. As for my recievers, I am going with Smith, Muhammed, Jarrett, Robinson, and Goodson, with Lee making the team as the third running back. Goodson will see some time at RB tho, and Fiamatta will also mkae the team. This will cut out some depth, and i would have to say goodbye to Teal and James Anderson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore is good, but he wont make it over Carter or even Beavers. I think that Beavers might actually surprise some ppl and make it over Moores spot on the pratice squad. As for my recievers, I am going with Smith, Muhammed, Jarrett, Robinson, and Goodson, with Lee making the team as the third running back. Goodson will see some time at RB tho, and Fiamatta will also mkae the team. This will cut out some depth, and i would have to say goodbye to Teal and James Anderson

I guess the question might be this: Is Moore a better return man than Beavers is a receiver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...