Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Want Jeremy Lin as a Backup?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

I'd rather have McRoberts than Boozer at this point.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

McRob will wanna get a better contract than what he's worth.

We could get Boozer for a 1-2 yr help to make us better and more experienced in the playoffs. He's a better post player and rebounder than Rob too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only if Nelson and some others are off the board.  I'm not sure I'd want Sessions over him.  Sessions could be cheaper though.  I do love Sessions' ability to drive and get to the line though, and his size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McRob will wanna get a better contract than what he's worth.

We could get Boozer for a 1-2 yr help to make us better and more experienced in the playoffs. He's a better post player and rebounder than Rob too.

I've already said I would give McRoberts a 3 year $14M offer. That's $4.7M per. I'm sure he'd take that, and I'm not worried about the post with the combination of Al, Zeller, and Vonleh. McRoberts' passing and feistiness are what I covet. You can never have enough good passers.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've already said I would give McRoberts a 3 year $14M offer. That's $4.7M per. I'm sure he'd take that, and I'm not worried about the post with the combination of Al, Zeller, and Vonleh. McRoberts' passing and feistiness are what I covet. You can never have enough good passers.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I think he's going to get more than that. I'm talking 5.5-6mil after seeing how crazy some of these guys are already getting. I'm not paying that much for McRob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we strike out in free agency I wouldn't mind a move like this if the other team was giving up a solid asset as well. With Houston though they don't really have any assets of interest (sorry not big on Terence jones).

I do remember that before the draft the lakers were floating around dealing their pick if anyone would take in Nash's 10 mil for this summer so they could make a run at 2 max guys. Who knows if lebron and melo start hinting that their interested in la maybe we swoop in take the last year of Nash and get randle in return. Hell I'd even throw in zeller if they wanted.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...