Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Guardians of the Galaxy Trailer

PandaPancake

By PandaPancake,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Rumors saying The Hulk could be connected to this film in a potential sequel.

Don't think it's true but it would be interesting to see "Planet Hulk"

I'm on my phone and can't tag spoilers but that is the rumor

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Rumors saying The Hulk could be connected to this film in a potential sequel.

 

Don't think it's true but it would be interesting to see "Planet Hulk"

 

I think Planet Hulk is maybe the only solo-Hulk film that would work, as so far he's been better as a sidekick in Avengers.  The only thing is, we need a build up to WHY those events transpired in the first place, because non-comic viewers have seen the Ruffalo version and maybe Norton but he hasn't been really shown to be dangerous in the films yet.

 

They'd also have to fill in Reed Richards' part in that too with someone else.  Could be awesome though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think Planet Hulk is maybe the only solo-Hulk film that would work, as so far he's been better as a sidekick in Avengers.  The only thing is, we need a build up to WHY those events transpired in the first place, because non-comic viewers have seen the Ruffalo version and maybe Norton but he hasn't been really shown to be dangerous in the films yet.

 

They'd also have to fill in Reed Richards' part in that too with someone else.  Could be awesome though.

 

He doesn't have to be sent away because he's dangerous. He could just be sent away by accident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

He doesn't have to be sent away because he's dangerous. He could just be sent away by accident.

 

I guess but I don't like that story line as much as the real one, one because it's important for him as a person to deal with that and two it makes Stark/Richards seem incompetent.  I guess though, they did screw it up anyway so maybe that doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • CRA
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By CRA · Posted

      Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...