Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We keep hearing Cho might rather make a trade....


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

For a hail mary, I'd say Klay Thompson. He's been talked about in trades and we need three point shooting. But I really have no idea for legitimate guys. Demar Derozan is probably the right kind of player. Above average, not great, with some potential to get better and a contract that's a bit too high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Gordon,

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

They better send a draft pick and take Hendo. His contract is atrocious.  

 

Also, Waiters from Cleveland could be a possible fit, would probably cost a bunch though.  Probably Zeller and a 1st rounder... that might not even do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well all I know is this better not be it. We need to show Al that we are committed to building around him.

 

At this point that Hayward offer just seems like a "hey at least we tried to bring a big name in" type of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hornets- Klay Thompson, Kevin Martin

Warriors- Kevin Love, Corey Brewer, Ronny Turiaf

T-Wolves- Harrison Barnes, David Lee, Gerald Henderson, Cody Zeller, 3 1st rd picks (2 GS, 1 CHA)

 

I don't think the Warriors do this type of deal without getting Klay.  

 

Don't get me wrong, I would love it, but just don't see it. 

 

I could see flipping Barnes and Klay and maybe removing Hendo from the deal, and it might would work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is in these three team trades guys that are enticing to us are also enticing to a team like Minnesota.

i.e. Waiters, Thompson etc...

Barnes might be available though.

The real problem...

Minnesota is acting like Love is Michael Jordan & asking for way too damn much.

Cleveland is only offering scrubs & won't include the one piece needed to get him (Wiggins).

Golden State isn't willing to part with the one guy Minnesota wants (Thompson) & is only offering average players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real problem...

Minnesota is acting like Love is Michael Jordan & asking for way too damn much.

Cleveland is only offering scrubs & won't include the one piece needed to get him (Wiggins).

Golden State isn't willing to part with the one guy Minnesota wants (Thompson) & is only offering average players.

Hopefully someone caves and we can help them out, while still getting a quality player in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...