Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets sign Lance Stephenson to 3yr/27m contract.


Jakob

Recommended Posts

Can't believe it! Wow.

 

The Charlotte Hornets will sign Lance Stephenson to a 3-year contract, the last season a team option, the Observer has learned.

— Rick Bonnell (@rick_bonnell)

July 16, 2014

Sources: Lance Stephenson accepts 3 yr, $27 million deal with Charlotte

— Chris Broussard (@Chris_Broussard)

July 16, 2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was skeptical as well with no link but.....

Lance Stephenson will sign a 3-year, $27M deal with the Charlotte #Hornets, as reported by the Charlotte Observer.

— NBAonSTC (@NBAonSTC)

July 16, 2014

Sources: Lance Stephenson accepts 3 yr, $27 million deal with Charlotte

— Chris Broussard (@Chris_Broussard)

July 16, 2014

#NBA - Lance Stephenson quitte les Pacers et rejoint les Hornets ! 27M$ sur 3 ans pic.twitter.com/QC6q3JCC77

— Yahoo Sport France (@YahooSportFR)

July 16, 2014

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we trade Henderson or Neal. Hendo would clean 6M Neal would clear 3.25M

Is their anyone else to get? Might as well keep Hendo on as a good perimeter defender second unit guy. He didn't score enough from the 2 spot to be an amazing starter, but I'm really excited for him as one of the top bench guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...