Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Focus


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

You know who's loving this whole Ray Rice incident that has spread into a witch hunt in our 24/7 news cycle?

 

Danny Boy Snyder...  2 weeks ago the "latest" outrage was the Redskins name.

 

Congress was involved, news publications (including our beloved CO) were all jumping on boycotting the name

 

Now, Congress is involved in this issue, major publications are calling for more suspensions before due process, etc.

 

People wonder why Congress doesn't get anything done, but us as the American public have no attention span anymore.  Politicians never have to commit to anything because the public has no focus and neither do they

 

The obsession with the next big issue proves this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's please not confuse our players with the reactionary chicken little posters here on the huddle.

 

Are you serious? This poo does play into the lockerroom. Actually this Greg Hardy accusation (I say that understanding Hardy has not had a trial by jury) is probably distracting the fug out of management this very moment. Every large, and now small media publication is dragging Hardy's name through the dirt as we speak. I'm not certain Hardy will make it past Sunday, if to then the way this poo storm is brewing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious? This poo does play into the lockerroom. Actually this Greg Hardy accusation (I say that understanding Hardy has not had a trial by jury) is probably distracting the fug out of management this very moment. Every large, and now small media publication is dragging Hardy's name through the dirt as we speak. I'm not certain Hardy will make it past Sunday, if to then the way this poo storm is brewing.

 

Thanks for creating a perfect example.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It should be a facto, because while he needs to perform to keep his job, you still have to build with an eye to the future. Where we will be drafting, there is a more than good chance of there being a player there at a position of more need, such as OT, LB, TE, S, or CB. With all those holes, I just don’t like the idea of taking a player who will ensure one of him, T-Mac, or Coker won’t be here 4 years from now, and we all know it won’t be T-Mac who gets jettisoned. So either believe in Coker or don’t, keep him and draft another position or draft a WR and trade him, don’t straddle the middle and hamstring us by leaving more holes while leaving us a huge problem a couple years from now.
    • Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
×
×
  • Create New...