Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shula Has To Go Soon


CollegePanther

Recommended Posts

Chud doesn't know how to call football games. He isn't an OC.

The only time won is when he called Shula like games at the end.

OL is the issue right now. Changing OCs is just rearranging the chairs on the Titanic

But its the coaching staffs job to call plays according to the personnel they have. For example if you know you have a poor oline maybe you will call plays that do not take a lot of time to develop. If you have better RBs than QB and WR you would run more than pass and vice versa.

I agree that changing OCs wont be a magical fix but if the coaching staff cant use the personnel they have to their best capabilities then changes should be made if possible in the personnel or coaching staff. The current play-calling so far would be ideal under a good oline but that is not the personnel we currently have and so far most of us haven't seen the necessary adjustments from the coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually a ton of posters still tore down Shula after the first two games. Including myself. If you watched the game he still called a ton of moronic plays hidden by our defense and their 3 TOs a game.

Hell, I know I have. Shula calls plays like he's a pop Warner coach.

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDermott is the one who has gone full stupid and seems to refuse to adapt to his players. Allowing teams to score 70% of the time is ridiculous. At least Shula has the offense better than many other NFL teams and in the top 10 in some categories.

Scheme hasn't changed or just all of a sudden irrelevant. Like the offense, the struggles are on the players and their lack of execution.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scheme hasn't changed or just all of a sudden irrelevant. Like the offense, the struggles are on the players and their lack of execution.

 

Actually the schemes have changed without Hardy. It is very apparent there is less stunting (possibly none at all in 4 games. Cannot recall seeing a single stunt on the DL) and fewer changes in looks on the DL. It has become more vanilla. Hardy would move into the DT position and swap sides with CJ throughout the game. The biggest part missing are the run stunts with the safety or corner blitz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I want to like Woods more, but there's something about him that I don't think will translate well over to the NFL. I thought he and Banks had potential to be our pick at 19, but I'm moving more away from this....defintely on Banks.  If Freeling isn't there at 19, I hope we move back.  In the mid-20s, I'd feel more comfortable with Iheanachor or Lomu. I don't feel like Miller can play LT, though he'd be a great replacement for Moton at RT. I'm also out on Proctor for OT.
    • Of the two, Decker would be my choice, but not at the pricetag he would command.  TBH, I'm in the Salyer camp as a competent fringe starter that is better than Yosh was, but unsure if he can hold up for 17+ regular season games. My guess is he would be a gamble like others are making on Chenal, Turk, etc. in rolling the dice on a promising young guy stuck buried on a talented depth chart.
    • Yeah, leaving Miami Ohio out would be dumb. Almost as dumb as now calling the play in games the "1st round". In a field of 64 you can't tell me there's not room for a 31-1 team. Hell, I volunteer my Heels to stay at home and give them our spot. LOL
×
×
  • Create New...