Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't hold your breath for more no huddle offense...


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

Don't put too much stock in to DN and his articles.

 

 

Shula has run the no huddle throughout his play calling career. The Bucs did it on a good number of occasions. You don't become a NFL OC without knowing how to run a hurry up no huddle offense.

 

 

Basically, DN does a good interview, but football knowledge is not his strong suit. Proceed with caution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't put too much stock in to DN and his articles.

 

 

Shula has run the no huddle throughout his play calling career. The Bucs did it on a good number of occasions. You don't become a NFL OC without knowing how to run a hurry up no huddle offense.

 

 

Basically, DN does a good interview, but football knowledge is not his strong suit. Proceed with caution.

 

shhhhhhh, the shula hate hype is up these days, logic is not welcome around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well according to RR's interview yesterday he has interest in it so that's greater than espn... didn't espn trash us the entire month of september and even stated our organization is a problem spot to some degree with a reference to Rae Carruth? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well according to RR's interview yesterday he has interest in it so that's greater than espn...

 

This is what I am interested in for sure.  If a defensive minded HC can see something succeeding on offensive and invest in it, then things can change.  We need to go up-tempo for Cam, the o-line, and the defense.  This helps keep the o-line in charge of what the d-line is doing, and we have flat out scored more points this way.  That ball control offense that always snaps the ball with 1 second on the clock gives the D to much time to adjust.  When you don't have superior o-line talent, that is never a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said after the last two losses, pre-snap was Cam's main problem. When you switch to the no huddle, you eliminate those issues that he had with dragging/lagging and sucking the energy out of his teammates which causes the line to block worse and the receivers and running backs to come out of the gate slower.

 

Cam's state of mind changes completely when he's in the no huddle. He is forced to approach the next play with the same energy that he should even when they aren't in no huddle. This is something he needs to learn. Peyton Manning, Andrew Luck, and even Derrick Anderson are crisp, no wasted time, business-like, but highly energetic out of the huddle. Cam "swags" out of it, and he ends up moving too slow until the team loses energy.

 

No huddle energizes him, which energizes the whole play.

 

Once he learns how to transfer the same mindset to when they aren't in no huddle, he'll be one of the top 5 QBs in the league. Both ESPN articles about no huddle simply support what I was telling you all about how Cam affects the rest of the team "before the snap"

 

SPEED UP, INCREASE YOUR ENERGY.

 

No huddle requires him to, but he should always be that focused and sharp. IT'S. ALL. ABOUT. THE. QB'S. MINDSET before the ball is snapped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said after the last two losses, pre-snap was Cam's main problem. When you switch to the no huddle, you eliminate those issues that he had with dragging/lagging and sucking the energy out of his teammates which causes the line to block worse and the receivers and running backs to come out of the gate slower.

 

Cam's state of mind changes completely when he's in the no huddle. He is forced to approach the next play with the same energy that he should even when they aren't in no huddle. This is something he needs to learn. Peyton Manning, Andrew Luck, and even Derrick Anderson are crisp, no wasted time, business-like, but highly energetic out of the huddle. Cam "swags" out of it, and he ends up moving too slow until the team loses energy.

 

No huddle energizes him, which energizes the whole play.

 

Once he learns how to transfer the same mindset to when they aren't in no huddle, he'll be one of the top 5 QBs in the league. Both ESPN articles about no huddle simply support what I was telling you all about how Cam affects the rest of the team "before the snap"

 

SPEED UP, INCREASE YOUR ENERGY.

 

No huddle requires him to, but he should always that focused and sharp. IT'S. ALL. ABOUT. THE. QB'S. MINDSET before the ball is snapped.

 

Ok....hehe ... Ok.. what you are saying is that Cam moving slow out the huddle ....makes the team move slower...and uhhh.. his Swag is causing the drops and fumbles and bad blocking...

 

Ahhhh... I mean.. wow...

 

Forum rules prevent me from responding properly.  However I will say that I disagree vehemently that Cam's swag is effecting the offense. 

If you were to say total team concentration goes up due to less time to think... ok I can see that.

More base defenses, tired defense, lets substitutions, unable to dial up more situational defenses because of the no huddle... I could go with all that.  

But Swag out of the huddle!!!!!!!  Really!!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said after the last two losses, pre-snap was Cam's main problem. When you switch to the no huddle, you eliminate those issues that he had with dragging/lagging and sucking the energy out of his teammates which causes the line to block worse and the receivers and running backs to come out of the gate slower.

Cam's state of mind changes completely when he's in the no huddle. He is forced to approach the next play with the same energy that he should even when they aren't in no huddle. This is something he needs to learn. Peyton Manning, Andrew Luck, and even Derrick Anderson are crisp, no wasted time, business-like, but highly energetic out of the huddle. Cam "swags" out of it, and he ends up moving too slow until the team loses energy.

No huddle energizes him, which energizes the whole play.

Once he learns how to transfer the same mindset to when they aren't in no huddle, he'll be one of the top 5 QBs in the league. Both ESPN articles about no huddle simply support what I was telling you all about how Cam affects the rest of the team "before the snap"

SPEED UP, INCREASE YOUR ENERGY.

No huddle requires him to, but he should always that focused and sharp. IT'S. ALL. ABOUT. THE. QB'S. MINDSET before the ball is snapped.

Cam often lags going into the next play because he just got hammered the play prior. Have a 290lb. defensive end hit you on your blindside and see how quick you are to get up and run to the line for the next play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam often lags going into the next play because he just got hammered the play prior. Have a 290lb. defensive end hit you on your blindside and see how quick you are to get up and run to the line for the next play.

 

Nope. Even when he hasn't been "hit" it's still a problem. Been one for years. You can say, "well look at his stats." I can say, they'd be even better if he set the right tone before each play. Again, no huddle forces him too, but he should have that same energy and focus coming out of a huddle. Get it, and watch the difference.

 

Of course people like you still won't realize that I was right if he ever does it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok....hehe ... Ok.. what you are saying is that Cam moving slow out the huddle ....makes the team move slower...and uhhh.. his Swag is causing the drops and fumbles and bad blocking...

 

Ahhhh... I mean.. wow...

 

Forum rules prevent me from responding properly.  However I will say that I disagree vehemently that Cam's swag is effecting the offense. 

If you were to say total team concentration goes up due to less time to think... ok I can see that.

More base defenses, tired defense, lets substitutions, unable to dial up more situational defenses because of the no huddle... I could go with all that.  

But Swag out of the huddle!!!!!!!  Really!!!!

 

 

It's been an issue for years. He allows the energy from previous plays to dissipate when they aren't in no huddle. It permeates through the entire squad, and it affects the outcome of plays because the energy level of the offensive unit decreases.

 

No huddle is the only thing stupid people can understand. Luckily, I'm not one of you.

 

Buddy Love: "You got to strut."

 

No, you need to SPEED UP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nowhere in that article does it talk about how much they plan to use it going forward. 

 

It's been an issue for years. He allows the energy from previous plays to dissipate when they aren't in no huddle. It permeates through the entire squad, and it affects the outcome of plays because the energy level of the offensive unit decreases.

 

No huddle is the only thing stupid people can understand. Luckily, I'm not one of you.

 

Buddy Love: "You got to strut."

 

No, you need to SPEED UP.

 

Did this come to you in a dream? Maybe while sleeping with pyramids to either side of you?

 

Our version of the no huddle isn't necessarily faster. We still often snap the ball at the last second. All it does is it keeps the defense from substituting, and it gives Cam more time to survey the defense before the snap.

 

But feel free to continue on with the "bad energy" angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Even when he hasn't been "hit" it's still a problem. Been one for years. You can say, "well look at his stats." I can say, they'd be even better if he set the right tone before each play. Again, no huddle forces him too, but he should have that same energy and focus coming out of a huddle. Get it, and watch the difference.

Of course people like you still won't realize that I was right if he ever does it.

I'm curious as to why people like you is in bold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...