Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beat writers speculate on DT help


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

If you can get a defensive tackle roughly as talented as Stewart is at running back, why is it a bad idea? As much as I like the idea of Smash Dash Slash, realistically, one of those players isn't going to see many snaps. You don't trade a rookie and it would be dumb to trade the best back in the league. That only leaves one running back with trade value left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can get a defensive tackle roughly as talented as Stewart is at running back, why is it a bad idea? As much as I like the idea of Smash Dash Slash, realistically, one of those players isn't going to see many snaps. You don't trade a rookie and it would be dumb to trade the best back in the league. That only leaves one running back with trade value left.

No, we aren't trading any of our RBs. Period. I'm not going to name of the dozens of reasons why it would be a bad idea. If that happened, I would go to Charlotte and personally bitch slap Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we are a run first team. without a good running game our offense goes from top 10 to bottom half of the league. Stewart doesn't only give us a good one-two punch in the backfield but hes also an insurance policy if something were to happen to Williams. (God forbid that to happen)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we are a run first team. without a good running game our offense goes from top 10 to bottom half of the league. Stewart doesn't only give us a good one-two punch in the backfield but hes also an insurance policy if something were to happen to Williams. (God forbid that to happen)

Goodson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodson?

why would you give up a 2nd year player that you already know is a beast, for a unproven rookie, who has shown a few flashes that he could be good but has also shown he has problems with holding on to the ball? goodson played pretty good. but im not sold on him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would you give up a 2nd year player that you already know is a beast, for a unproven rookie, who has shown a few flashes that he could be good but has also shown he has problems with holding on to the ball? goodson played pretty good. but im not sold on him yet.

Because your defensive line is such a joke that if it's left unaddressed then this will be a waste of a season. If they don't get a quality DT or 2 then you might as well start looking to 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rookie who has not even played a regular season game as our only backup? No thanks.

Not to mention a rookie that put the ball on the carpet twice last night.

I do not see any way that we trade Stewart.

Didn't you just describe the situation we were in at the start of last season? That worked out pretty well didn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't you just describe the situation we were in at the start of last season? That worked out pretty well didn't it?

Only because DLo was not injured. If DLo stays healthy all season, we won't need Goodson to be the man. Stewart was a beast in college. Goodson is still an enigma. His numbers in college declined each year and never lived up to his potential. I am not ready to hang our season on a guy with physical potential that has never delivered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because your defensive line is such a joke that if it's left unaddressed then this will be a waste of a season. If they don't get a quality DT or 2 then you might as well start looking to 2010.

its one preseason game. teams haven't even made there first cuts yet. calm down. someone will be signed/traded for. but stewart will not be traded. the value he brings to this team is greater than any DT we could trade him for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...