Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I want our team to be built like the Pats


Snake

Recommended Posts

Although I really dislike the Pats and there fans I have to say they have built a lasting product. Year in and year out they fill there holes with low tier FAs and gambles and it pays off because of good coaching and simply being flexible. I think the Giants have been built in a similar manor but maybe with better drafting and less troubled players. I hope to see a similar approach from DG in the future and it seemed he got it last year but didn't this year. Time will tell but at some point this organization needs to take risks in players that have reward and have a coach who they can trust to put good coaching on the field.

Any thoughts on how you guys would like to see our team structured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It comes down to being adaptive as a coach and making adjustments when things aren't working, and that's what Belichick is good at. Conversely, Ron Rivera wants to shoehorn his players to play a certain style and then when it doesn't work he just shrugs his shoulders and goes, "I dunno they aren't executing but we're going to try and do the same exact thing next week hope it works lol"

Remember when the offensive line on the Pats was making Brady play like poo because they couldn't protect? 4 games later they've given up only 4 sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Owner, Front Office, and Coaching makes them who they are, and unfortunately that isn't changing here anytime soon. 

 

Brady was out for a year, they plugged in a bum, and kept rolling along.  Jerry has been responsible for a team that is mediocre at best, and usually poor for its entirey.  Spygate aside, they've had no problem ever been unprepared for an opponent. 

 

Every game our coaching staff is discussed, and even a casual fan can notice the lack of good coaching.  It starts at the top, I'm tired of Cam shouldering all of the blame, it needs to be directed at those truly responsible.  There is no excuse for it.

 

I really can't think of many areas of this team that are in great shape as far as personnel and coaching.  We took steps back on defense last year, but we know that the potential is there.

 

Our offense has issues, and it starts with Ron and Shula, which makes Gettleman and Jerry ultimately responsible.  Their philosphy doesn't meet our personnel, and somehow we have glaring holes at every position on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...